The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IoT powered servitization of manufacturing – an exploratory case study
Open accessAbstract
More than ever companies are challenged to rethink their offerings while simultaneously being provided with a unique opportunity for creating or recreating their product-service systems. This paper seeks to address how servitisation can utilise the third wave of Internet development, referred to as the Internet of Things (IoT), which may unlock the potential for innovative product-service systems on an unprecedented scale. By providing an analysis of this technological breakthrough and the literature on servitisation, these concepts are combined to address the question of how organisations offering product-service systems can reap the benefits that the IoT. An analysis of three successful IoT implementation cases in manufacturing companies, representing different industry sectors such as metal processing, power generation and distribution, is provided. The results of the empirical research presented in the paper provide an insight into different ways of creating value in servitisation. The paper also proposes a framework that is aimed at proving a better understanding of how companies can create value, and add it to their servitisation processes with, the data obtained by the IoT based solutions. From the value chain perspective, IoT aided servitisation enables organisations to extend their value chains in order better serve their customers which, in turn, might result in increased profitability. The article proposes further research avenues, and offers valuable insight for practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570410699249 · Cited by 2,463
Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product‐service providers
Martinez, V., Bastl, M., Kingston, J., & Evans, S. (2010) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410381011046571 · Cited by 567
Cited by
Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 · Cited by 1,501
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P., & Li, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044 · Cited by 841
Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030639 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P., & Gunasekaran, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- 92-105
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593929104
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 86.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IoT powered servitization of manufacturing – an exploratory case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.016
- The paper
- Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P., & Gunasekaran, A. (2017). IoT powered servitization of manufacturing – an exploratory case study. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.