Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers

Open access
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, Cawley Vergara, Alejandro Mac, Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, Sawhney, Rapinder·2020·International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract

Abstract This article aims at examining the mediating role played by Organizational Learning (OL) capabilities at different contextualization levels on the association between Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies and operational performance. For that, we gathered information from 135 firms that have initiated their digital transformation towards the fourth industrial revolution era. Data was analyzed by means of multivariate data techniques. Our results show that learning capabilities at an organization level positively mediate the impact of I4.0 for achieving higher operational performance levels. However, OL at a team and individual level may not present a significant effect on such mediation. As I4.0 is claimed to facilitate a faster and more efficient identification and solution of manufacturing problems, our research provides empirical evidence to indicate that companies that systematically foster learning and knowledge sharing at an organization level can obtain greater benefits from I4.0 technologies adoption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.023

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Belsley, 2005, vol. 571
  2. Rupčić, 2018, Intergenerational learning and knowledge transfer–challenges and opportunities, Learn. Organ., 25, 135, 10.1108/TLO-11-2017-0117 · doi:10.1108/tlo-11-2017-0117
  3. Tamás, 2016, Waste reduction possibilities for manufacturing systems in the industry 4.0, vol. 161
  4. Tvenge, 2016, Combining learning factories and ICT-based situated learning, Procedia CIRP, 54, 101, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.031 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.031

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Tortorella, G. L., Cawley Vergara, A. M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Sawhney, R.
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
219
Pages
284-294
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955010130
Cited by
386
References
78
FWCI
34.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.023
The paper
Tortorella, G. L., Cawley Vergara, A. M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Sawhney, R. (2020). Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.