The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffusion of green products in industry 4.0: Reverse logistics issues during design of inventory and production planning system
Abstract
Abstract Under the paradigm of Industry 4.0, the present research attempts to model the reverse logistics and examine how product diffusion dynamics in the market affect the economic and environmental performances of an inventory and production planning (I&PP) system. We use the classic Bass (1969) model of diffusion of innovation to capture the returns of a single-generation of a product under the proposed architecture of systematical deployment of information-sharing strategies and I&PP policies under the notions of Industry 4.0 components. The key feature of Industry 4.0 characterized by virtualization of factory operations is captured using the simulation model. For the analysis, using the Taguchi experimental design framework, we present valuable managerial insights. Our findings suggest the relevant adoption patterns based on the combination of information-sharing and I&PP policies for the tradeoff between environmental and economic performance. An extensive sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of the model. Further, the managerial decisions on the environmental and economic performance measures reveal that in spite of the presence of Industry 4.0 technology capabilities, a close attention should be paid to operational parameters and their related costs when socially influenced green product adoption with the parameters such as size of end-user market and collection investment are governing the returns of the product to the reverse logistics system. Accordingly, the model exhibits a real-time decision support tool for the sustainable reverse logistics system in Industry 4.0 environment at large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Qaiser, F. H. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583 · Cited by 489
Self-citationGhobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Digital transformation success under Industry 4.0: a strategic guideline for manufacturing SMEs
Ghobakhloo, M., & Iranmanesh, M. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-11-2020-0455 · Cited by 379
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Swami, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 223
- Pages
- 107519
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979715439
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion of green products in industry 4.0: Reverse logistics issues during design of inventory and production planning system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107519
- The paper
- Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Swami, S. (2020). Diffusion of green products in industry 4.0: Reverse logistics issues during design of inventory and production planning system. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.