The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies
Open accessAbstract
COVID-19 outbreak has implied significant changes in the way service organizations work, affecting employees' routine and activities. At the same time, the advent of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) introduced new technologies that might facilitate such activities, mitigating the COVID-19's implications. The objective of this research is two-fold. First, we aim at examining the impact of COVID-19's work implications on employees' performance (i.e. output quality and delivery). Second, we seek to verify the moderating role of I4.0 base technologies on this relationship. We surveyed 106 employees of different service organizations who have been working remotely during the pandemic and analyzed their responses through multivariate techniques. Results revealed that COVID-19's work implications (i.e. home office work environment, job insecurity and virtual connection) do impact employee's performance, although not at the same extent. Further, we found that I4.0 technologies moderate the enhancement of employee's performance. However, the orientation and intensity of such moderation may vary according to the performance metric and work implication under analysis. As COVID-19 outbreak inevitably pushed new ways of working that can become an integral part of the post-pandemic world, our research provides important theoretical and practical implications for improving employee's performance through the digitalization of service organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression
Vittinghoff, E., & McCulloch, C. E. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk052 · Cited by 4,359
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R., & Holford, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 · Cited by 2,154
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945 · cited 1×
“Unanticipated change introduced by exogenous events such as the outbreak of COVID-19 is expected to partially paralyze organizations and their respective employees, and force them into vulnerable zones (Williams et al., 2017).”
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D., & Hazen, B. T. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599 · Cited by 889 · cited 1×
“EFA is generally adopted in situations where a scale needs to be developed, helping the identification of latent constructs of variables (Fabrigar et al., 1999).”
Zhang, S. X., Wang, Y., Rauch, A., & Wei, F. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112958 · Cited by 828
Cited by
Gajdosikova, D., Valaskova, K., Kliestik, T., & Machova, V. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10173130 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayanamurthy, G., & Tortorella, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 234
- Pages
- 108075
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3133230566
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 85.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.