Extractables/leachables from plastic tubing used in product manufacturing
Abstract
While the ability of packaging systems to contribute leached substances to finished drug products is well established, increasing interest is being focused on the potential contamination of drug substances by plastic materials encountered during their production. The direct contact of such plastic parts (such as tubing, gaskets, filters and temporary storage containers) with the drug substance at some point in its production raises the possibility that plastic-related contaminants (leachables) may be present in the finished drug product. In this study, eight tubing materials potentially encountered in pharmaceutical production facilities, including six silicone materials and two Santoprene materials, were characterized for their extractable substances by static extraction coupled with comprehensive chemical characterization of the resulting extracts. Based on the extractables profiles thus generated, target leachables were identified for each tubing material. The accumulation of these target leachables was studied by subjecting the tubing to dynamic flow, simulated use extractions. The primary organic extractables from the silicone tubing were a homologous series of silicone oligomers, with most of the tubings demonstrating a unique distribution of oligomers. Several of the silicone tubings also possessed extractable dioctyl phthalate and dioctyl adipate. The primary organic extractables from the Santoprene-type tubing included a number of phthalates, a series of alkyl phenol…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other materials such as PEEK, PP, and silicone also play important roles, with PEEK providing excellent mechanical and thermal properties for high-performance connectors and housings, and silicone offering flexibility and biocompatibility, though it requires thorough evaluation for extractables.
“Other materials such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polypropylene (PP), and silicone also play important roles, with PEEK providing excellent mechanical and thermal properties for high-performance connectors and housings, and silicone offering flexibility and biocompatibility, though it requires thorough evaluation for extractables (Kushwah, et al. 2022; Huang, et al. 2011; Jenke et al. 2006).”
From Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Jenke et al. 2006
Materials like PES, HPPE, UHMWPE, and PVDF are commonly used due to their exceptional chemical resistance, thermal stability, and low permeability.
“Materials like polyethersulfone (PES), polyethylene (high-performance polyethylene (HPPE), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are commonly used due to their exceptional chemical resistance, thermal stability, and low permeability.”
From Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Jenke et al. 2006
These materials retain mechanical strength and microbial barrier function even after gamma irradiation, making them ideal for sterile filtration systems.
“These materials retain their mechanical strength and microbial barrier function even after gamma irradiation, making them ideal for sterile filtration systems.”
From Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Jenke et al. 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions
Glenz, M., Eiermann, P., Manser, B., & Teschner, H. (2026) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-026-13847-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jenke, D. R., Story, J., & Lalani, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 75-92
- ISSN
- 0378-5173
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review