Cited by 36Antimicrobial agents and applicationsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes

Antibacterial properties of cyclodextrin–antiseptics-complexes determined by microplate laser nephelometry and ATP bioluminescence assay

Finger, Susanne, Wiegand, Cornelia, Buschmann, Hans-Jürgen, Hipler, Uta-Christina·2013·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are able to form inclusion complexes with other molecules, thereby, protecting these guest molecules from degradation, enhancing their biocompatibility or influencing their physiological distribution while retaining their activity. Here, antibacterial effects of CD-complexes with the antiseptics chlorhexidine diacetate (CHX), iodine (IOD) and polihexanide (PHMB) were determined using two different in vitro methods, microplate laser nephelometry and an ATP bioluminescence assay. Laser nephelometry is a direct method for monitoring and evaluating growth of micro-organisms by measurement of the turbidity of the solution. In contrast, the ATP bioluminescence assay determines specifically the amount of metabolic active bacterial cells. The antibacterial effects of CD-antiseptics-complexes were examined for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis and the results of both methods were compared in respect of calculated means of half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) and statistical evaluated Pearson's correlation coefficients (r). It could be demonstrated that both methods showed a high comparability although they differ in the parameters tested. This study revealed that CD-complexes with CHX and PHMB were most effective against E. coli and the tested staphylococci. While CD-IOD-complexes obtained high activity against K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa was distinctly more resistant compared to the other bacteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.080

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioluminescence assay has been used by several authors for antibacterial testing, antimycobacterial testing, antifungal against yeast and molds.

    “Moreover, It has been used by several authors for antibacterial testing [89], antimycobacterial testing [90], [91], antifungal against yeast [92] and molds [93].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finger, S., Wiegand, C., Buschmann, H.-J., & Hipler, U.-C.
Affiliations
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Deutsches Textilforschungszentrum Nord-West (DE)
Corresponding author
Finger, Susanne
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
452
Issue
1-2
Pages
188-193
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3140922844
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Keywords
cyclodextrins, inclusion complexes, antibacterial activity, chlorhexidine diacetate, iodine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, laser nephelometry, ATP bioluminescence, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, half maximal inhibitory concentration, method comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review