Solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with lipoyl–memantine codrug: Preparation and characterization
Abstract
Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are considered very attractive drug-delivery systems (DDS) able to enhance the efficacy of some therapeutic agents in several pathologies difficult to treat in a conventional way. Starting from these evidences, this study describes the preparation, physicochemical characterization, release, and in vitro cytotoxicity of stealth SLNs as innovative approach to improve solubility and absorption through the gastrointestinal tract of lipoyl-memantine (LA-MEM), a potential anti-Alzheimer codrug. Physico-chemical properties of LA-MEM loaded SLNs have been intensively investigated. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to clarify the state and crystalline structure of the formulation. The results obtained from particles size analysis, polydispersity (PDI), and zeta potential measurements allowed the identification of the optimized formulation, which was characterized by a drug-lipid ratio 1:5, an average intensity diameter of 170nm, a PDI of 0.072, a zeta potential of -33.8mV, and an entrapment efficiency of 88%. Moreover, in vitro stability and release studies in both simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF), and preliminary in vitro cytotoxicity studies revealed that LA-MEM loaded SLNs could represent potential candidate for an in vivo investigation as DDS for the brain since it resulted devoid of citotoxicity and able to release the free codrug.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PEGylated nanoliposomes and SLNs loaded with galantamine and memantine showed increased brain-targeted delivery with neuroprotective properties.
“PEGylated nanolipsomes and SLNs loaded with galantamine105 and memantine106 showed increased brain-targeted delivery with neuroprotective properties.106”
From Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles (2019) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Laserra, S., Basit, A., Sozio, P., Marinelli, L., Fornasari, E., Cacciatore, I., Ciulla, M., Türkez, H., Geyikoglu, F., & Di Stefano, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- UCL School of Pharmacy (GB)
- Erzurum Technical University (TR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 485
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 183-191
- ISSN
- 0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976884436
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MIUR
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- solid lipid nanoparticles, codrugs, drug delivery systems, stealth nanoparticles, anti-Alzheimer agents, gastrointestinal drug release, encapsulation efficiency, cytotoxicity, drug solubility enhancement, nanoparticle characterization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Cell Survival, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Crystallization, Drug Carriers, Drug Stability, Gastric Juice, Humans, Intestinal Secretions, Kinetics, Lipids, Thioctic Acid, Memantine, Particle Size, Solubility, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Oxidative Stress, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Nanotechnology, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review