Cited by 29Terahertz technology and applicationsMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Noninvasive porosity measurement of biconvex tablets using terahertz pulses

Bawuah, Prince, Ervasti, Tuomas, Tan, Nicholas, Zeitler, J. Axel, Ketolainen, Jarkko, Peiponen, Kai-Erik·2016·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Biconvex pharmaceutical microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) compacts were investigated by the detection of terahertz (THz) pulse delay in the transmission measurement mode. The dimensions of the tablets were kept as constants but the porosity was a priori known variable. It is shown that the porosity of the biconvex compact has a linear correlation with the THz pulse delay. By constructing a calibration line between these two parameters (i.e. porosity and THz pulse delay), it is possible to non-invasively detect porosity of biconvex tablets. We suggest that this preliminary study could be the starting point of in-depth future studies on the screening of porosity and related properties of real biconvex pharmaceutical tablets using terahertz sensing techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.06.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total porosity can be calculated from a THz-TDS measurement by using effective medium theory and knowing the intrinsic refractive index of the solid matrix.

    “The total porosity can thus be calculated from a THz-TDS measurement by utilizing effective medium theory and knowing the intrinsic refractive index of the solid matrix.”
  • THz-TDS has been demonstrated to measure porosity of rocks and pharmaceutical tablets and to analyze anisotropy of pore structures.

    “This method has been demonstrated to measure the porosity of rocks [20] and pharmaceutical tablets [21,22,23] as well as to analyze the anisotropy of pore structures [18,24].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 29

Authors
Bawuah, P., Ervasti, T., Tan, N., Zeitler, J. A., Ketolainen, J., & Peiponen, K.-E.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Bawuah, Prince
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
509
Issue
1-2
Pages
439-443
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413028657
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
tablet porosity, microcrystalline cellulose, calibration lines
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Excipients, Pulse, Tablets, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Porosity, Terahertz Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review