Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer

ANAND, L, AMES, N·2006·International Journal of Plasticity

Abstract

Abstract Interest in instrumented indentation experiments as a means to estimate mechanical properties has grown rapidly in recent years. Although numerous nano/micro-indentation experimental studies on polymeric materials have been reported in the literature, a corresponding methodology for extracting material property information from the experimental data does not exist. This situation for polymeric materials exists primarily because baseline numerical analyses of sharp indentation using appropriate large deformation constitutive models for the nonlinear viscoelastic–plastic response of these materials appear not to have been previously reported in the literature. An existing, widely used theory for amorphous polymers (e.g. [Boyce, M., Parks, D., Argon, A.S., 1988. Large inelastic deformation of glassy polymers. Part 1: Rate dependent constitutive model. Mechanics of Materials 7, 15–33; Arruda, E.M., Boyce, M.C., 1993. Evolution of plastic anisotropy in amorphous polymers during finite straining. International Journal of Plasticity 9, 697–720]) has been recently found to lack sufficient richness to enable one to quantitatively reproduce the major features of the indentation load-versus-depth curves for some common amorphous polymers [Gearing, B.P., 2002. Constitutive equations and failure criteria for amorphous polymeric solids. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. This study develops a new continuum model for the viscoelastic–plastic deformation of amorphous polymeric solids. We have applied the constitutive model to capture salient features of the mechanical response of the amorphous polymeric solid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) at ambient temperature and stress states under which this material does not exhibit crazing. We have conducted compression-tension strain-controlled experiments, as well as stress-controlled compression-creep experiments, and these experiments are used to calibrate the material parameters in the constitutive model for PMMA. We have implemented our constitutive model in a finite-element computer program, and using this finite-element program we have simulated micro-indentation experiments on PMMA. We show that our constitutive model and finite element simulations reproduce the experimentally-measured indentation load-versus-depth response with reasonable accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
ANAND, L., & AMES, N.
Venue
International Journal of Plasticity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1170
ISSN
0749-6419 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006097000
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006
The paper
ANAND, L., & AMES, N. (2006). On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. International Journal of Plasticity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.