The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer
Abstract
Abstract Interest in instrumented indentation experiments as a means to estimate mechanical properties has grown rapidly in recent years. Although numerous nano/micro-indentation experimental studies on polymeric materials have been reported in the literature, a corresponding methodology for extracting material property information from the experimental data does not exist. This situation for polymeric materials exists primarily because baseline numerical analyses of sharp indentation using appropriate large deformation constitutive models for the nonlinear viscoelastic–plastic response of these materials appear not to have been previously reported in the literature. An existing, widely used theory for amorphous polymers (e.g. [Boyce, M., Parks, D., Argon, A.S., 1988. Large inelastic deformation of glassy polymers. Part 1: Rate dependent constitutive model. Mechanics of Materials 7, 15–33; Arruda, E.M., Boyce, M.C., 1993. Evolution of plastic anisotropy in amorphous polymers during finite straining. International Journal of Plasticity 9, 697–720]) has been recently found to lack sufficient richness to enable one to quantitatively reproduce the major features of the indentation load-versus-depth curves for some common amorphous polymers [Gearing, B.P., 2002. Constitutive equations and failure criteria for amorphous polymeric solids. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. This study develops a new continuum model for the viscoelastic–plastic deformation of amorphous polymeric solids. We have applied the constitutive model to capture salient features of the mechanical response of the amorphous polymeric solid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) at ambient temperature and stress states under which this material does not exhibit crazing. We have conducted compression-tension strain-controlled experiments, as well as stress-controlled compression-creep experiments, and these experiments are used to calibrate the material parameters in the constitutive model for PMMA. We have implemented our constitutive model in a finite-element computer program, and using this finite-element program we have simulated micro-indentation experiments on PMMA. We show that our constitutive model and finite element simulations reproduce the experimentally-measured indentation load-versus-depth response with reasonable accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review
Sun, L., Huang, W. M., Ding, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, C. C., Purnawali, H., & Tang, C. (2012) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.065 · Cited by 1,105
Maurel-Pantel, A., Baquet, E., Bikard, J., Bouvard, J. L., & Billon, N. (2015) · International Journal of Plasticity · doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.10.004 · Cited by 130
Shojaei, A., Li, G., & Voyiadjis, G. Z. (2013) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.4007140 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- ANAND, L., & AMES, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plasticity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1123-1170
- ISSN
- 0749-6419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006097000
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006
- The paper
- ANAND, L., & AMES, N. (2006). On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. International Journal of Plasticity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.