Cited by 149Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesMachine Learning in Materials ScienceMicrostructure and mechanical properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A machine learning framework to predict local strain distribution and the evolution of plastic anisotropy & fracture in additively manufactured alloys

Muhammad, Waqas, Brahme, Abhijit P., Ibragimova, Olga, Kang, Jidong, Inal, Kaan·2021·International Journal of Plasticity

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102867

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goodfellow, 2016, vol. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 149

Metadata

Authors
Muhammad, W., Brahme, A. P., Ibragimova, O., Kang, J., & Inal, K.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Inal, Kaan
Venue
International Journal of Plasticity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
136
Pages
102867
ISSN
0749-6419 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089021334
Cited by
149
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 13
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Plasticity (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Microstructure and mechanical properties
Keywords
local strain distribution, plastic anisotropy, fracture prediction, AlSi10Mg, laser powder bed fusion, additive manufacturing, porosity, computed tomography, digital image correlation, artificial neural networks, tensile deformation, shear bands, crack initiation, microstructure-property relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review