Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns.

Kalcioglu, M. Tayyar, Toplu, Yuksel, Ozturan, Orhan, Yakinci, Cengiz·2006·International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Abstract

Objective Auricular abnormalities are important for early diagnosis of the birth defects in the prematures and newborns. Auricular antropometric studies in healthy premature and mature population depend on their gestational age are limited and insufficient. The aims of this study were to reveal antropometric growth and dynamics of the auricle in the healthy newborns from the 28th to the 42nd gestation weeks.Materials and methods A total of 600 newborns were evaluated in 40 groups. Each group comprising 20 preterm or term newborns according to their sexes and gestational weeks. Six surface dimensions were performed directly from the right ears of the subjects: the length from the superaurale to subaurale, the width from the tragus to helix, the width from the tragus to antihelix, the conchal depth, the distance from the helix to mastoid at superaural level and the distance from the helix to mastoid at tragal level. The frequency of the prominent ear deformity and lobule attachment were also noted.Results The results of auricular antropometric measurements of healthy preterm and term newborns in different gestational weeks were to determined. No statistical differences of auricular length were found between male and female infants. The incidence of the prominent ear deformity and attached lobule was 8.16 and 27.4%, respectively.Conclusions Normal anthropometric features for healthy newborns on the basis of gestational age are very important for the diagnosis of a variety of congenital malformations or syndromes. In this study, antropometric measurements of the auricle in the healthy preterm and term newborns on the basis of gestational age in our region were noted. Similar anthropometric studies in the preterm and term newborns at different geographic and various socioeconomic areas should be performed to constitute normative data in the literature.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.06.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kalcioglu, M. T., Toplu, Y., Ozturan, O., & Yakinci, C.
Affiliations
Inonu University (TR)
Venue
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
121-127
ISSN
0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109377510
Cited by
27
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
auricle, preterm infants, term infants, gestational age, ear anomalies, ear dimensions, reference values
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Ear, External, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.