Left temporal impairment of auditory information processing in prematurely born 9-year-old children: an electrophysiological study
Abstract
Children born preterm more than average display cognitive difficulties that are significant enough to prevent normal schooling. The aim of our study was to provide better understanding of the long-term neuropathological processes associated with preterm injury, through the hypothesis that mild cognitive disorders might be related to slight deficits in primary functions such as attention and perception. Assessment of auditory pre-attentive processes was performed by recording the obligatory sensory response (N250) and the change-detection response (Mismatch Negativity, MMN). Topographic study of these responses was performed in fifteen 9-year-old children born preterm (27-33 weeks gestational age) matched to fifteen control children born at term. The auditory stimulus sequence consisted of 1000 Hz standard and 1100 Hz deviant tones (15%) delivered binaurally with an interstimulus interval of 700 ms. The results showed that MMN was similar in both groups. Analysis of the responses to standard repetitive tones demonstrated significantly smaller N250 wave amplitude in children born preterm. Scalp current density maps showed that this reduction in amplitude was associated with lower activity of both frontal and left supratemporal generators. Although the functional significance of the N250 wave in children remains to be clarified, our results indicate a disorder of auditory processes related to prematurity that might have consequences on the development of higher-level processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nine-year-old preterm children showed reduced electrophysiological auditory responses relative to full term children in one study.
“A study of 9-year-old preterm children found reduced electrophysiological responses to auditory stimuli compared to the responses of full term children [14].”
From Sensory processing in preterm preschoolers and its association with executive function (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Gomot, M., Bruneau, N., Laurent, J.-P., Barthélémy, C., & Saliba, E.
- Affiliations
- Université de Tours (FR)
- Université Paris 8 (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Gomot, Marie
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-129
- ISSN
- 0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095946951
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- preterm birth, auditory processing, N250, mismatch negativity, pre-attentive auditory processing, left temporal cortex, cognitive impairment, attention deficits, auditory perception
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Attention, Auditory Perception, Child, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Functional Laterality, Male, Reference Values, Temporal Lobe, Matched-Pair Analysis, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review