Cited by 65Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMusic Therapy and Health

A neuroanatomical dissociation for emotion induced by music

Open access
Johnsen, Erica L., Tranel, Daniel, Lutgendorf, Susan, Adolphs, Ralph·2009·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Does feeling an emotion require changes in autonomic responses, as William James proposed? Can feelings and autonomic responses be dissociated? Findings from cognitive neuroscience have identified brain structures that subserve feelings and autonomic response, including those induced by emotional music. In the study reported here, we explored whether feelings and autonomic responses can be dissociated by using music, a stimulus that has a strong capacity to induce emotional experiences. We tested two brain regions predicted to be differentially involved in autonomic responsivity (the ventromedial prefrontal cortex) and feeling (the right somatosensory cortex). Patients with damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex were impaired in their ability to generate skin-conductance responses to music, but generated normal judgments of their subjective feelings in response to music. Conversely, patients with damage to the right somatosensory cortex were impaired in their self-rated feelings in response to music, but generated normal skin-conductance responses to music. Control tasks suggested that neither impairment was due to basic defects in hearing the music or in cognitively recognizing the intended emotion of the music. The findings provide evidence for a double dissociation between feeling emotions and autonomic responses to emotions, in response to music stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Borod J 2000 Neuropsychology of Emotion NY Oxford University Press
  2. Davidson RJ Goldsmith HH Scherer K 2003 Handbook of Affective Science New York Oxford University Press
  3. Gottselig JM 2001 Human neuroanatomical systems for perceiving emotion in music Doctoral Dissertation University of Iowa 2001
  4. Johnsen EL 2004 Neuroanatomical correlates of emotional experiences from music Doctoral dissertation University of Iowa 2004
  5. Zatorre RJ Peretz I 2001 The biological foundation of music Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930

Authors
Johnsen, E. L., Tranel, D., Lutgendorf, S., & Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Tranel, Daniel
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
24-33
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086630223
Cited by
65
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067681)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022549)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS19632, P01NS019632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
emotions, music, autonomic responses, skin conductance, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, double dissociation, emotion perception, subjective feelings, brain damage
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Auditory Threshold, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Psycholinguistics, Autonomic Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review