Startle response potentiation to chemosensory anxiety signals in socially anxious individuals
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate whether withdrawal related behavior is activated in the context of chemosensory anxiety signals. Moreover, it was examined whether chemosensory perception of social stress is modulated by the degree of social anxiety. Axillary sweat was collected from students, awaiting an oral examination at the university (anxiety condition) and from the same students in a sport control condition. The chemosensory stimuli were presented to 32 participants (16 socially anxious) via an olfactometer during inhalation (duration=3 s). 102 dB white noise bursts served as startle probes. During a single session only male or female axillary sweat was presented, therefore, all participants were tested in two separate sessions. Even though the chemosensory stimuli were perceived at the perceptual threshold level, participants could identify (forced choice) the emotion of the donors in the anxiety condition. In the context of chemosensory anxiety signals the acoustic startle reflex was significantly augmented as compared to startle responses obtained in the context of sport sweat (p=0.002). This effect was more pronounced in socially anxious than in non-anxious participants. It is concluded that human motor systems automatically adapt to chemosensory stress signals. This adaptation is neither dependent on the gender of the odor donor nor on the gender of the perceiver, but is intensified in socially anxious participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human body odors vary according to emotional states of the donors, and these changes can be perceived by receivers.
“a number of further evidences confirmed that human body odors vary according to emotional states of the donors and that these changes can be perceived by receivers”
From The scent of emotions: A systematic review of human intra‐ and interspecific chemical communication of emotions (2020) · cites this paper as Pause, Adolph, Prehn‐Kristensen, & Ferstl, 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Pause, B. M., Adolph, D., Prehn-Kristensen, A., & Ferstl, R.
- Affiliations
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pause, Bettina M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-92
- ISSN
- 0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014607201
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- social anxiety, axillary sweat, acoustic startle response, startle potentiation, olfactory perception, social stress, withdrawal behavior, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Noise, Odorants, Self Concept, Social Perception, Reflex, Startle, Stimulation, Chemical, Stress, Psychological, Sweat, Signal Detection, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review