Cited by 59Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFree Will and Agency

Stop or stop-change — does it make any difference for the inhibition process?

Boecker, Maren, Gauggel, Siegfried, Drueke, Barbara·2013·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

In the course of daily living altering environmental conditions or changing internal states often cause us to abandon obsolete planned or initiated actions and force us to update our behavior. The stop-change paradigm, an extension of the very popular stop-signal paradigm, allows the investigation of response inhibition and response re-engagement in a laboratory setting. This is very important as everyday life rarely calls for the complete suppression of actions without subsequent behavioral adjustment. The present review first gives a short overview on stop-signal inhibition and its behavioral and neural models before summarizing the findings in the stop-change domain. In doing so, this review shall contribute to a better understanding of the functional and neural architecture of response inhibition and re-engagement. Moreover, the question is raised whether the same or different inhibition process(es) are involved in stop-signal- and stop-change inhibition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HRT's competing response includes engagement in different motor actions, thereby activating different brain areas and cognitive structures.

    “Whilst both of these forms of competing response overlap functionally, in terms of depending on inhibitory brain mechanisms [45], the former relies on pure suppression (i.e. no response taking place), while the latter includes engagement in different motor actions , thereby activating different brain areas and cognitive structures [46 -51]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 59

Authors
Boecker, M., Gauggel, S., & Drueke, B.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Boecker, Maren
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
234-243
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980937300
Cited by
59
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
stop-signal task, response inhibition, behavioral flexibility, action suppression
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Neurological, Neuropsychological Tests, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review