Cited by 13Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Oxytocinergic modulation of brain activation to cues related to reproduction and attachment: differences and commonalities during the perception of erotic and fearful social scenes

Sauer, Carina, Montag, Christian, Reuter, Martin, Kirsch, Peter·2019·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

In animal research, the neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has been known for its role in reproduction and attachment for a longer time. There is strong evidence for an involvement of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system for these effects of OT. In contrast, human research rather concentrated on more human concepts of social cognition and behavior (e.g. trust or processing of fearful faces) and mainly focused on the amygdala as the main neurobiological substrate. To extend this view, we wanted to gain more insight into the neurobiological effects of OT in the context of reproduction and attachment in humans and compare these effects to its well-known effects on fear processing. In a double-blind placebo-controlled fMRI study, we investigated 55 healthy young men using intranasal OT administration. During fMRI, participants saw attachment-related erotic scenes and fearful social scenes. Over all participants, OT had a differential effect on processing of erotic and fearful scenes. While OT administration led to a relative increase of neural activation in mesolimbic structures during processing of erotic stimuli, it decreased amygdala activation for fearful stimuli. On the individual level, we observed significant positive correlations between OT induced activation changes across different brain regions and under different stimulus conditions. Our findings extend the already existing animal literature and provide evidence for a similar involvement of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system for OT effects in the context of reproduction and attachment in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 13

Authors
Sauer, C., Montag, C., Reuter, M., & Kirsch, P.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirsch, Peter
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
136
Pages
87-96
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810890081
Cited by
13
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KI 576/10-1, RE 1692/4-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, mesolimbic dopamine system, reproduction, social attachment, amygdala, brain activation, intranasal oxytocin, individual differences, social cognition
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Amygdala, Double-Blind Method, Fear, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Sexual Behavior, Social Perception, Ventral Tegmental Area, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review