Patient empowerment: A cross-disease exploration of antecedents and consequences
Abstract
Emphasized by the World Health Organization as one of its key topics, patient empowerment (PE)—i.e., the set of self-determined behaviors based on patients' individual needs for developing autonomy and competence with their disease—is today regarded as a key component of a patient-centered approach to healthcare. Unfortunately, research lacks a clear understanding of the drivers of PE, its relationship to therapy compliance, and its role in different types of diseases. Using a large sample of 1622 patients suffering from chronic diseases , this study addresses these critical research gaps and provides three major contributions. First, by exploring the influence of PE antecedents (i.e., patients' health involvement, self-efficacy, and acceptance of physician authority), it provides specific recommendations on how to effectively manage PE (defined in terms of three dimensions: information search, knowledge development, and decision participation). Second, it demonstrates the importance of PE and its antecedents for affecting patients' therapy compliance and shows that, depending on the PE dimension, therapy compliance is either enhanced or reduced. By highlighting the ambiguous role of PE in therapy compliance, the study offers specific suggestions for healthcare stakeholders on how to maximize patients' compliance to recommended therapies. Third, the study provides important insights into the role of PE across different types of chronic diseases , offering practical recommendations on how to deal with patients depending on their particular disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Understanding empowerment is a boost for survivors about achieving desired results.
“This is because understanding empowerment is a boost for survivors about achieving the desired results [57].”
From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Prigge, J.-K., Dietz, B., Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D., & Burton, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- High Point University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Homburg, Christian
- Venue
- International Journal of Research in Marketing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-386
- ISSN
- 0167-8116 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W617587253
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Research in Marketing (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hoffman-La Roche
- Roche
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- patient empowerment, chronic disease, therapeutic compliance, self-efficacy, patient-centered care, patient autonomy, information search, knowledge development, decision participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review