The power of generative marketing: Can generative AI create superhuman visual marketing content?
Open accessAbstract
Generative AI’s capacity to create photorealistic images has the potential to augment human creativity and disrupt the economics of visual marketing content production. This research systematically compares the performance of AI-generated to human-made marketing images across important marketing dimensions. First, we prompt seven state-of-the-art generative text-to-image models (DALL-E 3, Midjourney v6, Firefly 2, Imagen 2, Imagine, Realistic Vision, and Stable Diffusion XL Turbo) to create 10,320 synthetic marketing images, using 2,400 real-world, human-made images as input. 254,400 human evaluations of these images show that AI-generated marketing imagery can surpass human-made images in quality, realism, and aesthetics. Second, we give identical creative briefings to commissioned human freelancers and the AI models, showing that the best synthetic images also excel in ad creativity, ad attitudes, and prompt following. Third, a field study with more than 173,000 impressions demonstrates that AI-generated banner ads can compete with professional human-made stock photography, achieving an up to 50% higher click-through rate than a human-made image. Collectively, our findings suggest that the paradigm shift brought about by generative AI can help advertisers produce marketing content not only faster and orders of magnitude cheaper but also at superhuman effectiveness levels with important implications for firms, consumers, and policymakers. To facilitate future research on AI-…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent marketing research study shows that advertisements generated by AI alone outperform advertisements generated by humans alone on measures such as perceived quality, realism, and advertising effectiveness, and banner ads designed by AI have higher click-through rates than human-made banner ads.
“A recent marketing research study shows that advertisements generated by AI alone (e.g., users only implement the workflow) outperform advertisements generated by humans alone on measures such as perceived quality, realism, and advertising effectiveness. This field study shows that banner ads designed by AI have higher click-through rates than human-made banner ads [37].”
From Decoupling of Usefulness and Novelty: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Novice Designers' Creative Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 70 · Cited by 229
- Authors
- Hartmann, J., Exner, Y., & Domdey, S.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hartmann, Jochen
- Venue
- International Journal of Research in Marketing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-31
- ISSN
- 0167-8116 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402680739
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 137 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 163.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Research in Marketing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Keywords
- generative AI, text-to-image models, click-through rate, banner advertising, stock photography, advertising economics, DALL-E 3, Midjourney
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review