Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis

Open access
Kato, Hirotoshi, Tsujii, Hirohiko, Miyamoto, Tadaaki, Mizoe, Jun-etsu, Kamada, Tadashi, Tsuji, Hiroshi, Yamada, Shigeru, Kandatsu, Susumu, Yoshikawa, Kyosan, Obata, Takayuki, Ezawa, Hidefumi, Morita, Shinroku, Tomizawa, Minoru, Morimoto, Naoki, Fujita, Junichi, Ohto, Masao·2004·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and antitumor effect of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within a Phase I-II trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between June 1995 and February 1997, 24 patients with histopathologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma were treated to 15 fractions within 5 weeks in a step-wise dose-escalation study. The disease stage was Stage II in 10, IIIA in 6, and IVA in 8 patients. The Common Toxicity Criteria, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria, and Child-Pugh score were used to evaluate toxicity. The antitumor effect was evaluated by the tumor response, cumulative local control, and survival rates. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 71 months (range, 63-83 months), no severe adverse effects and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The Child-Pugh score did not increase by >2 points after the start of therapy. In 78% and 75% of all patients, the score did not increase by >1 point in the early and late phase, respectively. The overall tumor response rate was 71%. The local control and overall survival rate was 92% and 92%, 81% and 50%, and 81% and 25% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Carbon ion radiotherapy appears safe and effective for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional clinical studies using a larger subject group are required to confirm the therapeutic efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Kato, H., Tsujii, H., Miyamoto, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Kamada, T., Tsuji, H., Yamada, S., Kandatsu, S., Yoshikawa, K., Obata, T., Ezawa, H., Morita, S., Tomizawa, M., Morimoto, N., Fujita, J., & Ohto, M.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
1468-1476
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081853109
Cited by
194
References
1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.032
The paper
Kato, H., Tsujii, H., Miyamoto, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Kamada, T., Tsuji, H., Yamada, S., Kandatsu, S., Yoshikawa, K., Obata, T., Ezawa, H., Morita, S., Tomizawa, M., Morimoto, N., Fujita, J., & Ohto, M. (2004). Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.