The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and antitumor effect of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within a Phase I-II trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between June 1995 and February 1997, 24 patients with histopathologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma were treated to 15 fractions within 5 weeks in a step-wise dose-escalation study. The disease stage was Stage II in 10, IIIA in 6, and IVA in 8 patients. The Common Toxicity Criteria, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria, and Child-Pugh score were used to evaluate toxicity. The antitumor effect was evaluated by the tumor response, cumulative local control, and survival rates. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 71 months (range, 63-83 months), no severe adverse effects and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The Child-Pugh score did not increase by >2 points after the start of therapy. In 78% and 75% of all patients, the score did not increase by >1 point in the early and late phase, respectively. The overall tumor response rate was 71%. The local control and overall survival rate was 92% and 92%, 81% and 50%, and 81% and 25% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Carbon ion radiotherapy appears safe and effective for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional clinical studies using a larger subject group are required to confirm the therapeutic efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
Particle Radiation Therapy Using Proton and Heavier Ion Beams
Schulz-Ertner, D., & Tsujii, H. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.7816 · Cited by 622
Self-citationEffectiveness of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Skull-Base Chordomas
Schulz-Ertner, D., Karger, C. P., Feuerhake, A., Nikoghosyan, A., Combs, S. E., Jäkel, O., Edler, L., Scholz, M., & Debus, J. (2007) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.059 · Cited by 290
Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and Importance of Linear Energy Transfer
Sylvester, C. B., Abe, J.-I., Patel, Z. S., & Grande-Allen, K. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00005 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Kato, H., Tsujii, H., Miyamoto, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Kamada, T., Tsuji, H., Yamada, S., Kandatsu, S., Yoshikawa, K., Obata, T., Ezawa, H., Morita, S., Tomizawa, M., Morimoto, N., Fujita, J., & Ohto, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1468-1476
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081853109
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.032
- The paper
- Kato, H., Tsujii, H., Miyamoto, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Kamada, T., Tsuji, H., Yamada, S., Kandatsu, S., Yoshikawa, K., Obata, T., Ezawa, H., Morita, S., Tomizawa, M., Morimoto, N., Fujita, J., & Ohto, M. (2004). Results of the first prospective study of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.