Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab With Hypofractionated Stereotactic Irradiation for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas

Open access
Gutin, Philip H., Iwamoto, Fabio M., Beal, Kathryn, Mohile, Nimish A., Karimi, Sasan, Hou, Bob L., Lymberis, Stella, Yamada, Yoshiya, Chang, Jenghwa, Abrey, Lauren E.·2009·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

Purpose Preclinical studies suggest that inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) improves glioma response to radiotherapy. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, has shown promise in recurrent gliomas, but the safety and efficacy of the concurrent use of bevacizumab with brain irradiation has not been extensively studied. The objectives of this study were to determine the safety and activity of this combination in malignant gliomas. Methods and Materials After prior treatment with standard radiation therapy patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) and anaplastic gliomas (AG) received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV) every 2 weeks of 28-day cycles until tumor progression. Patients also received 30 Gy of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) in 5 fractions after the first cycle of bevacizumab. Results Twenty-five patients (20 GBM and 5 AG) median age of 56 years (range, 30 to 80) and median KPS 90 (range, 70 to 100) received a median of 7 cycles of bevacizumab. One patient did not undergo HFSRT because overlap with prior radiotherapy would exceed the safe dose allowed to the optic chiasm. Three patients discontinued treatment due to: grade 3 CNS intratumoral hemorrhage, wound dehiscence and bowel perforation. Other non-hematologic and hematologic toxicities were transient. No radiation necrosis was seen in these previously-irradiated patients. For the GBM cohort, overall response rate was 50%, 6-month progression free survival was 65%; median overall survival was 12.5 months and 1-year survival was 54%. Discussion Bevacizumab in combination with HFSRT is safe and well tolerated. Radiographic responses, duration of disease control and survival suggest that this regimen is active in recurrent malignant glioma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.043

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Gutin, P. H., Iwamoto, F. M., Beal, K., Mohile, N. A., Karimi, S., Hou, B. L., Lymberis, S., Yamada, Y., Chang, J., & Abrey, L. E.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
156-163
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137686302
Cited by
370
References
4
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab With Hypofractionated Stereotactic Irradiation for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.043
The paper
Gutin, P. H., Iwamoto, F. M., Beal, K., Mohile, N. A., Karimi, S., Hou, B. L., Lymberis, S., Yamada, Y., Chang, J., & Abrey, L. E. (2009). Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab With Hypofractionated Stereotactic Irradiation for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.