The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE To investigate the local control and radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with brain metastases >2 cm in size who received single-fraction or multifraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); factors associated with clinical outcomes and the development of brain radionecrosis were assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with brain metastases >2.0 cm who received SRS as primary treatment at Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy, were analyzed. Cumulative incidence analysis was used to compare local control and radiation-induced brain necrosis between groups from the time of SRS. To achieve a balanced distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups, a propensity score analysis was used. RESULTS The 1-year cumulative local control rates were 77% in the single-fraction SRS (SF-SRS) group and 91% in the multifraction SRS (MF-SRS) group (P=.01). Recurrences occurred in 25 and 11 patients who received SF-SRS or MF-SRS (P=.03), respectively. Thirty-one patients (20%) undergoing SF-SRS and 11 (8%) subjected to MF-SRS experienced brain radionecrosis (P=.004); the 1-year cumulative incidence rate of radionecrosis was 18% and 9% (P=.01), respectively. Significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of local control and risk of radionecrosis were maintained after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Multifraction SRS at a dose of 27 Gy in 3 daily fractions seems to be an effective treatment modality for large brain metastases, associated with better local control and a reduced risk of radiation-induced radionecrosis as compared with SF-SRS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. Á., & Brumback, B. (2000) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011 · Cited by 5,581
A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk
Gray, R. J. (1988) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951 · Cited by 4,960
Chang, E. L., Wefel, J. S., Hess, K. R., Allen, P. K., Lang, F. F., Kornguth, D. G., Arbuckle, R. B., Swint, J. M., Shiu, A. S., Maor, M. H., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70263-3 · Cited by 2,475
Aoyama, H., Shirato, H., Tago, M., Nakagawa, K., Toyoda, T., Hatano, K., Kenjyo, M., Oya, N., Hirota, S., Shioura, H., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.21.2483 · Cited by 2,213
Kocher, M., Soffietti, R., Abacioglu, U., Villà, S., Fauchon, F., Baumert, B. G., Fariselli, L., Tzuk-Shina, T., Kortmann, R.-D., Carrie, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.1655 · Cited by 1,988
Shaw, E., Scott, C., Souhami, L., Dinapoli, R., Kline, R., Loeffler, J., & Farnan, N. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00507-6 · Cited by 1,608
Sperduto, P. W., Kased, N., Roberge, D., Xu, Z., Shanley, R., Luo, X., Sneed, P. K., Chao, S. T., Weil, R. J., Suh, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.38.0527 · Cited by 1,425
Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis
Minniti, G., Clarke, E., Lanzetta, G., Osti, M. F., Trasimeni, G., Bozzao, A., Romano, A., & Enrici, R. M. (2011) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/1748-717x-6-48 · Cited by 828
Self-citationBlonigen, B. J., Steinmetz, R. D., Levin, L., Lamba, M. A., Warnick, R. E., & Breneman, J. C. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.006 · Cited by 506
cem: Software for Coarsened Exact Matching
Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v030.i09 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Minniti, G., Scaringi, C., Paolini, S., Lanzetta, G., Romano, A., Cicone, F., Osti, M., Enrici, R. M., & Esposito, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1142-1148
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2302127234
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 26.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.013
- The paper
- Minniti, G., Scaringi, C., Paolini, S., Lanzetta, G., Romano, A., Cicone, F., Osti, M., Enrici, R. M., & Esposito, V. (2016). Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.