The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real-time optimal intersection control system for automated/cooperative vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Automated vehicles (AVs) are an emerging technology in the automotive industry. The numerous research efforts that are being dedicated to the development of these systems makes them achievable in the near future. The need to make this technology mature is justified by potential safety gains from the elimination of human error, the enhancement of mobility through the reduction of congestion, and the protection of the environment through the reduction in vehicle emissions. Algorithms are needed to deliver optimal and/or sub-optimal solutions for situations and/or scenarios that AVs would encounter in the field. In this paper, an attempt to optimize the movement of AVs through intersections is developed. The developed model is a real-time optimization problem subjected to dynamic constraints (i.e., ordinary differential equations governing the motion of a vehicle) and static constraints (i.e., maximum achievable velocities). By virtue of the Lagrangian formulation used in Pontryagin’s minimum principle and convex optimization, the solution that minimizes the trip time is obtained. This logic is simulated and compared to the operation of a roundabout, an all-way stop sign, and a traffic-signal-controlled intersection. The results demonstrate that a 55% reduction in delay is achievable compared to the best of these three intersection control strategies, on average. An interesting byproduct of this new logic is a 43% reduction in fuel consumption (reduction from an average of 200 mL to 115 mL) and CO2 emissions (a reduction from 445 g for the roundabout to 265 g).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Few studies test scenarios in which the communicating capabilities of SAVs are used at intersections for passing the intersection (e.g.Bichiou & Rakha, 2019), without the use of conventional signals.”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Bichiou & Rakha, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Abdul Aziz, 2012, Unified framework for dynamic traffic assignment and signal control with cell transmission model, Transp. Res. Board, 73, 10.3141/2311-07 · DOI
- Ahn, 2002, Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels, J. Transp. Eng., 128, 182, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(182) · DOI
- Azimi, R., Bhatia, G., Rajkumar, R., Mudalige, P., 2013. Reliable intersection protocols using vehicular networks. 2013 Cyber Physical Systems. · DOI
- de La Fortelle, A., 2015, September. Coordination of automated vehicles at intersections: decision, efficiency and control. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 1708–1712. · DOI
- Le, 2013, Linear-quadratic model predictive control for urban traffic networks, Social Behav. Sci., 512, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.028 · DOI
- Lee, 2012, Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 13, 81, 10.1109/TITS.2011.2178836 · DOI
- Li, 2012, Cooperative driving at blind crossings using intervehicle communication, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 55, 1712, 10.1109/TVT.2006.878730 · DOI
- Li, 2013, Modeling reservation-based autonomous intersection control in vissim, Transp. Res. Board, 81, 10.3141/2381-10 · DOI
- Massera, 2016, Safely optimizing highway traffic with robust model predictive control-based cooperative adaptive cruise control, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
- Medina, A.I.M., Van De Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H., 2015, September. Automation of a T-intersection using virtual platoons of cooperative autonomous vehicles. In: ITSC. pp. 1696–1701. · DOI
- Rakha, 2009, Validation of van aerde’s simplified steadystate car-following and traffic stream model, Transp. Lett., 1, 227, 10.3328/TL.2009.01.03.227-244 · DOI
- Rakha, 2004, Development of vt-micro model for estimating hot stabilized light duty vehicle and truck emissions, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 9, 49, 10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00054-3 · DOI
- Rakha, H., Kamalanathsharma, R.K., 2011, October. Eco-driving at signalized intersections using V2I communication. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on IEEE. pp. 341–346. · DOI
- Rakha, 2001, Vehicle dynamics model for predicting maximum truck acceleration levels, J. Transp. Eng., 127, 418, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(418) · DOI
- Rakha, 2009, A simplified behavioral vehicle longitudinal motion model, Transp. Lett., 1, 95, 10.3328/TL.2009.01.02.95-110 · DOI
- Roozemond, 2001, Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control, Oper. Res. Int. J., 131, 293, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00129-6 · DOI
- Ye, 2015, Distributed model predictive control method for optimal coordination of signal splits in urban traffic networks, Asian J. Control, 17, 775, 10.1002/asjc.1011 · DOI
- Zhu, M., Li, X., Huang, H., Kong, L., Li, M., Wu, M.Y., 2009, October. LICP: A look-ahead intersection control policy with intelligent vehicles. In: Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 2009. MASS’09. IEEE 6th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 633–638. · DOI
- Zohdy, I.H., Rakha, H., 2012, September. Game theory algorithm for intersection-based cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) systems. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on IEEE. pp. 1097–1102. · DOI
- Zohdy, 2016, Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: The intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 20, 17, 10.1080/15472450.2014.889918 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 · Cited by 691
Metadata
- Authors
- Bichiou, Y., & Rakha, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rakha, Hesham A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 2046-0430 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804317020
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, cooperative vehicles, intersection control, real-time optimization, Pontryagin maximum principle, convex optimization, vehicle dynamics constraints, roundabouts, stop signs, traffic signal control, fuel consumption reduction, CO2 emissions, traffic congestion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review