Cited by 45Traffic control and managementTransportation Planning and OptimizationRoad Transport and Highway Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Real-time optimal intersection control system for automated/cooperative vehicles

Open access
Bichiou, Youssef, Rakha, Hesham A.·2019·International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) are an emerging technology in the automotive industry. The numerous research efforts that are being dedicated to the development of these systems makes them achievable in the near future. The need to make this technology mature is justified by potential safety gains from the elimination of human error, the enhancement of mobility through the reduction of congestion, and the protection of the environment through the reduction in vehicle emissions. Algorithms are needed to deliver optimal and/or sub-optimal solutions for situations and/or scenarios that AVs would encounter in the field. In this paper, an attempt to optimize the movement of AVs through intersections is developed. The developed model is a real-time optimization problem subjected to dynamic constraints (i.e., ordinary differential equations governing the motion of a vehicle) and static constraints (i.e., maximum achievable velocities). By virtue of the Lagrangian formulation used in Pontryagin’s minimum principle and convex optimization, the solution that minimizes the trip time is obtained. This logic is simulated and compared to the operation of a roundabout, an all-way stop sign, and a traffic-signal-controlled intersection. The results demonstrate that a 55% reduction in delay is achievable compared to the best of these three intersection control strategies, on average. An interesting byproduct of this new logic is a 43% reduction in fuel consumption (reduction from an average of 200 mL to 115 mL) and CO2 emissions (a reduction from 445 g for the roundabout to 265 g).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Abdul Aziz, 2012, Unified framework for dynamic traffic assignment and signal control with cell transmission model, Transp. Res. Board, 73, 10.3141/2311-07 · DOI
  2. Ahn, 2002, Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels, J. Transp. Eng., 128, 182, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(182) · DOI
  3. Azimi, R., Bhatia, G., Rajkumar, R., Mudalige, P., 2013. Reliable intersection protocols using vehicular networks. 2013 Cyber Physical Systems. · DOI
  4. de La Fortelle, A., 2015, September. Coordination of automated vehicles at intersections: decision, efficiency and control. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 1708–1712. · DOI
  5. Le, 2013, Linear-quadratic model predictive control for urban traffic networks, Social Behav. Sci., 512, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.028 · DOI
  6. Lee, 2012, Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 13, 81, 10.1109/TITS.2011.2178836 · DOI
  7. Li, 2012, Cooperative driving at blind crossings using intervehicle communication, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 55, 1712, 10.1109/TVT.2006.878730 · DOI
  8. Li, 2013, Modeling reservation-based autonomous intersection control in vissim, Transp. Res. Board, 81, 10.3141/2381-10 · DOI
  9. Massera, 2016, Safely optimizing highway traffic with robust model predictive control-based cooperative adaptive cruise control, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
  10. Medina, A.I.M., Van De Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H., 2015, September. Automation of a T-intersection using virtual platoons of cooperative autonomous vehicles. In: ITSC. pp. 1696–1701. · DOI
  11. Rakha, 2009, Validation of van aerde’s simplified steadystate car-following and traffic stream model, Transp. Lett., 1, 227, 10.3328/TL.2009.01.03.227-244 · DOI
  12. Rakha, 2004, Development of vt-micro model for estimating hot stabilized light duty vehicle and truck emissions, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 9, 49, 10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00054-3 · DOI
  13. Rakha, H., Kamalanathsharma, R.K., 2011, October. Eco-driving at signalized intersections using V2I communication. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on IEEE. pp. 341–346. · DOI
  14. Rakha, 2001, Vehicle dynamics model for predicting maximum truck acceleration levels, J. Transp. Eng., 127, 418, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(418) · DOI
  15. Rakha, 2009, A simplified behavioral vehicle longitudinal motion model, Transp. Lett., 1, 95, 10.3328/TL.2009.01.02.95-110 · DOI
  16. Roozemond, 2001, Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control, Oper. Res. Int. J., 131, 293, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00129-6 · DOI
  17. Ye, 2015, Distributed model predictive control method for optimal coordination of signal splits in urban traffic networks, Asian J. Control, 17, 775, 10.1002/asjc.1011 · DOI
  18. Zhu, M., Li, X., Huang, H., Kong, L., Li, M., Wu, M.Y., 2009, October. LICP: A look-ahead intersection control policy with intelligent vehicles. In: Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 2009. MASS’09. IEEE 6th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 633–638. · DOI
  19. Zohdy, I.H., Rakha, H., 2012, September. Game theory algorithm for intersection-based cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) systems. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on IEEE. pp. 1097–1102. · DOI
  20. Zohdy, 2016, Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: The intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 20, 17, 10.1080/15472450.2014.889918 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bichiou, Y., & Rakha, H. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rakha, Hesham A.
Venue
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
2046-0430 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804317020
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, cooperative vehicles, intersection control, real-time optimization, Pontryagin maximum principle, convex optimization, vehicle dynamics constraints, roundabouts, stop signs, traffic signal control, fuel consumption reduction, CO2 emissions, traffic congestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review