Cited by 43Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesDermatologic Treatments and ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Psychosocial adjustment to skin conditions resulting in visible difference (disfigurement): What do we know? Why don’t we know more? How shall we move forward?

Open access
Rumsey, N.·2018·International Journal of Women’s Dermatology

Abstract

This article offers an overview of the current understanding of the psychological factors and processes that play a part in the continuum of distress and positive adjustment in people who are affected by dermatological conditions that affect appearance. Despite research demonstrating the significant psychosocial challenges posed by visible difference and mounting evidence of the role played by psychosocial variables in the etiology, exacerbation, and treatment of skin conditions, current healthcare provisions focus predominantly on the amelioration of physical manifestations. Impediments to progress in the understanding of psychological adjustment, blocks to the development of effective interventions, and challenges to the implementation of integrated psychological and medical care are reviewed. A route map to advance current understanding and care provision is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.09.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bundy C. Visible difference associated with skin disease: Skin conditions Rumsey N. Harcourt D. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of appearance 2012 Oxford University Press Oxford 398 413
  2. Clarke A. Thompson A. Jenkinson E. Rumsey N. Newall R. CBT for appearance anxiety: Psychosocial interventions for anxiety due to visible differences 2014 Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken (NJ)
  3. Seligman M. Authentic happiness 2002 Free Press New York

Authors
Rumsey, N.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Rumsey, N.
Venue
International Journal of Women’s Dermatology
Published
2018-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2-7
ISSN
2352-6475 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772182970
Cited by
43
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Women’s Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
psychosocial adjustment, visible difference, skin diseases, psychological distress, body image, psychological intervention, health care delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review