Psychosocial adjustment to skin conditions resulting in visible difference (disfigurement): What do we know? Why don’t we know more? How shall we move forward?
Open accessAbstract
This article offers an overview of the current understanding of the psychological factors and processes that play a part in the continuum of distress and positive adjustment in people who are affected by dermatological conditions that affect appearance. Despite research demonstrating the significant psychosocial challenges posed by visible difference and mounting evidence of the role played by psychosocial variables in the etiology, exacerbation, and treatment of skin conditions, current healthcare provisions focus predominantly on the amelioration of physical manifestations. Impediments to progress in the understanding of psychological adjustment, blocks to the development of effective interventions, and challenges to the implementation of integrated psychological and medical care are reviewed. A route map to advance current understanding and care provision is proposed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with visible disfigurement often encounter social difficulties including stigmatization, dealing with reactions of others and limitations in personal relationships.
“In addition, they often encounter social difficulties including stigmatization, dealing with reactions of others and limitations in personal relationships.”
From A Novel Psychological Group Intervention Targeting Appearance-Related Distress Among People With a Visible Disfigurement (Inside Out): A Case Study (2023) · cites this paper as Rumsey, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bundy C. Visible difference associated with skin disease: Skin conditions Rumsey N. Harcourt D. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of appearance 2012 Oxford University Press Oxford 398 413
- Clarke A. Thompson A. Jenkinson E. Rumsey N. Newall R. CBT for appearance anxiety: Psychosocial interventions for anxiety due to visible differences 2014 Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken (NJ)
- Seligman M. Authentic happiness 2002 Free Press New York
- Authors
- Rumsey, N.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rumsey, N.
- ORCID
- Rumsey, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Women’s Dermatology
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-7
- ISSN
- 2352-6475 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5986108
- OpenAlex
- W2772182970
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Women’s Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- psychosocial adjustment, visible difference, skin diseases, psychological distress, body image, psychological intervention, health care delivery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review