The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Self-citationA Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03706 · Cited by 553
Self-citationManagement challenges in creating value from business analytics
Vidgen, R., Shaw, S., & Grant, D. B. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.023 · Cited by 493
Exploring ethics and human rights in artificial intelligence – A Delphi study
Stahl, B. C., Brooks, L., Hatzakis, T., Santiago, N., & Wright, D. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122502 · Cited by 95
Barriers to the Implementation of AI in Organizations: Findings from a Delphi Study
Bérubé, M., Giannelia, T., & Vial, G. (2021) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.805 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Paré, G., Cameron, A.-F., Poba-Nzaou, P., & Templier, M.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 207-217
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050647805
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003
- The paper
- Paré, G., Cameron, A.-F., Poba-Nzaou, P., & Templier, M. (2013). A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
