Cited by 73Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Milk fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus R389 and its non-bacterial fraction confer enhanced protection against Salmonella enteritidis serovar Typhimurium infection in mice

Open access
Vinderola, Gabriel, Matar, Chantal, Perdigón, Gabriela·2007·Immunobiology

Abstract

Bacterial infections in the gastrointestinal tract represent a major global health problem, even in the presence of normally effective mucosal immune mechanisms. Milk fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus R389 (FM) or its non-bacterial fraction obtained by milk fermentation at controlled pH 6 (NBF) are able to activate the small intestine mucosal immune response according to previous studies. In this work we aimed at comparing their protection capacity against an infection by Salmonella enteritidis serovar Typhimurium and at studying the mechanisms involved. In a completely randomized design, BALB/c mice received FM or NBF for 2, 5 or 7 consecutive days, followed by a single oral challenge with S. Typhimurium (10(7) cells/mouse). The increase in the number of IgA+ cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine, after the feeding periods, was accompanied by an increase in the luminal content of total S-IgA. However, no antibodies were produced against the NBF. In mice given the FM or the NBF for 7 consecutive days, lower levels of liver colonization on day 7 post-challenge with S. Typhimurium, higher luminal contents of specific anti-Salmonella S-IgA, higher percentages of survival to infection and lower numbers of MIP-1alpha+ cells in the lamina propria were observed. In this work we observed that in both the FM or the NBF there are active principles that confer enhanced protection against S. Typhimurium infection. However, the mechanisms underlying mucosal immunomodulation and protection are different. In those mechanisms, the mucosal immune response would seem to be more involved than the competitive or exclusion mechanisms between L. helveticus R389 and S. enteritidis serovar Typhimurium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.09.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Milk fermented with L. helveticus R389 was able to induce immune response and exert a protective effect against Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli O157.

    “Milk fermented with L. helveticus R389 was able to induce immune response and exert a protective effect against Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli O157 (LeBlanc et al., 2004; Vinderola et al., 2007b).”

    From Lactobacillus helveticus: the proteolytic system (2013) · cites this paper as Vinderola et al., 2007b

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 73

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Holmgren, J., Svennerholm, A.M., 2004. Mucosal immunity to bacteria. In: Mestecky, J., Lamm, M.E., Strober, W., Bienenstock, J., McGhee, J.R., Mayer, L. (Eds.), Mucosal Immunology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 783-797.
  2. Lee, Y.K., Nomoto, K., Salminen, S., Gorbach, S.L., 1999. Handbook of Probiotics. Wiley, New York, pp. 1-22.
  3. Vinderola, G., Matar, C., Perdigo´n, G., 2006b. Mucosal immunomodulation by the non-bacterial fraction of milk fermented by L. helveticus R389. Int. J. Food Microbiol., in press.

Authors
Vinderola, G., Matar, C., & Perdigón, G.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Université de Moncton (CA)
  • National University of Tucumán (AR)
Corresponding author
Perdigón, Gabriela
Venue
Immunobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
212
Issue
2
Pages
107-118
ISSN
0171-2985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994954454
Cited by
73
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
fermented milk, Salmonella typhimurium, intestinal colonization, mucosal immunity, secretory IgA, lamina propria, MIP-1α, probiotics, competitive exclusion
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Salmonella Infections, Animal, Salmonella typhimurium, Cultured Milk Products, Mice, Lactobacillus helveticus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review