Cited by 29Environmental remediation with nanomaterialsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Engineered nanomaterials for (waste)water treatment - A scientometric assessment and sustainability aspects

Open access
Davarazar, Mahsa, Kamali, Mohammadreza, Lopes, Isabel·2021·NanoImpact

Abstract

Application of nanomaterials for the treatment of effluents originated from various industrial and non-industrial sources, has been rapidly developed in recent decades. In this situation, there is a need for conclusive studies to identify the current status of the knowledge in this field and to promote the commercialization of such technologies by providing recommendations for future studies. In the present manuscript, a scientometric assessment on the progress made in this field has been performed and the results have been organized and discussed in terms of science statistics, research hotspots and trends, as well as the relevant sustainability aspects. Based on a set of keywords, identified through a pre-literature analysis, a total of 6539 documents were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database and analyzed to achieve the main goals of this study. The results demonstrate that the studies in this field have been initiated since the beginning of the 2000s but were mainly performed in lab and pilot scales. Also, China and Iran were identified as the most contributing countries in this scientific area in terms of the number of publications. Among various types of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), there has been especial attention for the application of iron-based nanomaterials as well as carbonaceous structures (such as graphene oxide and biochar). Besides, there are not still strong collaborations formed among researchers in this area worldwide. Regarding the research hotspots, the synthesis of green and sustainable nanomaterials (e.g., biosynthesis approaches) has received attention in recent years. The results can also demonstrate that the most widely studied pathway for the removal of pollutants from (waste)waters involves the adsorption of the pollutants using ENMs. Treatment of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) as well as exploring the mechanisms involved in the treatment of contaminated (waste)waters using ENMs and the possible by-products are considered the current trends in the literature. Regarding the sustainability aspects of ENMs for (waste)water treatment, the results achieved in this study calls for in-depth sustainability studies, which consider parameters such as economic, environmental, and social aspects of nanomaterials utilization for (waste)water treatment purposes, besides the technical parameters, to push transferring such technologies from lab and pilot scales to large and real-scale applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100316

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 159 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kamali M, Persson KM, Costa ME, Capela I. Sustainability criteria for assessing nanotechnology applicability in industrial wastewater treatment: Current status and future outlook. Environ Int 2019;125:261-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.055. · DOI
  2. Khodaparast Z, Kamali M, Seifi T. Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles -A review. Int. Conf. Eng. (ICEUBI 2013), Covilha, Portugal: 2013, p. 1-8.

Authors
Davarazar, M., Kamali, M., & Lopes, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Kamali, Mohammadreza
  • Lopes, Isabel
Venue
NanoImpact
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
22
Pages
100316
ISSN
2452-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156665659
Cited by
29
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NanoImpact (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
KU Leuven (PDM/19/104)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
engineered nanomaterials, wastewater treatment, effluent treatment, iron-based nanomaterials, graphene oxide, biochar, green synthesis, biosynthesis, adsorption, emerging contaminants, sustainability assessment, research trends, research hotspots
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Environmental Pollutants, Water Purification, Nanostructures, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review