Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques

Open access
Latha, C. Beulah Christalin, Jeeva, S. Carolin·2019·Informatics in Medicine Unlocked

Abstract

Machine learning involves artificial intelligence, and it is used in solving many problems in data science. One common application of machine learning is the prediction of an outcome based upon existing data. The machine learns patterns from the existing dataset, and then applies them to an unknown dataset in order to predict the outcome. Classification is a powerful machine learning technique that is commonly used for prediction. Some classification algorithms predict with satisfactory accuracy, whereas others exhibit a limited accuracy. This paper investigates a method termed ensemble classification, which is used for improving the accuracy of weak algorithms by combining multiple classifiers. Experiments with this tool were performed using a heart disease dataset. A comparative analytical approach was done to determine how the ensemble technique can be applied for improving prediction accuracy in heart disease. The focus of this paper is not only on increasing the accuracy of weak classification algorithms, but also on the implementation of the algorithm with a medical dataset, to show its utility to predict disease at an early stage. The results of the study indicate that ensemble techniques, such as bagging and boosting, are effective in improving the prediction accuracy of weak classifiers, and exhibit satisfactory performance in identifying risk of heart disease. A maximum increase of 7% accuracy for weak classifiers was achieved with the help of ensemble classification. The performance of the process was further enhanced with a feature selection implementation, and the results showed significant improvement in prediction accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imu.2019.100203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Latha, C. B. C., & Jeeva, S. C.
Venue
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
16
Pages
100203
ISSN
2352-9148 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954788759
Cited by
647
References
1
FWCI
71.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100203
The paper
Latha, C. B. C., & Jeeva, S. C. (2019). Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.