Cited by 307Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metals in PlantsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Bio-accumulation and distribution of heavy metals in fibre crops (flax, cotton and hemp)

Open access
Angelova, V., Ivanova, R., Delibaltova, V., Ivanov, K.·2004·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Flax, hemp and cotton, grown in industrially polluted region, were included in the present research. The experimental plots were situated at different distances (0.5 and 15 km) from the source of pollution-the Non-Ferrous-Metal Works (MFMW) near Plovdiv. We investigated the level of pollution and the way heavy metals enter the fibre crops, by taking soil and plant samples. The contents of heavy metals in plant materials (roots, stems, leaves, seeds, flowers) were determined after the method of the dry mineralization. The quantitative measurements were carried out with inductively-coupled plasma (ICP). A clearly distinguished species peculiarity exists in the accumulation of heavy metals in the vegetative and reproductive organs of flax, hemp and cotton. Flax is the crop that most strongly absorbs and accumulates heavy metals from the soil, followed by hemp and cotton. The distribution of the heavy metals along the plant axis of the studied crops seems to be selective, therefore their contents in flax and hemp are decreasing in the following order: roots > stems > leaves > seeds, while in cotton: leaves > seeds > roots > stems. A strongly exhibited tendency towards decrease of the contents of heavy metals in the fibre crops is observed as the distance from the NFMW increases. Flax and hemp are cultures, suitable for growing in industrially polluted regions-they remove considerable quantities of heavy metals from the soil with their root system and can be used as potential crops for cleaning the soil from heavy metals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelova, V., Ivanova, R., Delibaltova, V., & Ivanov, K.
Affiliations
Agricultural University Plovdiv (BG)
Corresponding author
Angelova, V.
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
197-205
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988735851
Cited by
307
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 22
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
  • renati (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
heavy metals, bioaccumulation, flax, hemp, cotton, fiber crops, industrial pollution, phytoremediation, soil contamination, Plovdiv

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review