Cited by 1,002Lignin and Wood ChemistrySpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Characterisation of structure-dependent functional properties of lignin with infrared spectroscopy

Open access
Boeriu, Carmen G., Bravo, Dominique, Gosselink, Richard J.A., van Dam, Jan E.G.·2004·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was evaluated as an analytical technique for the estimation of the chemical composition and functional properties of lignin. A sample set containing various non-wood, hardwood and softwood lignins isolated by different processing technologies was used. The lignin samples were characterised by both conventional chemical analysis and non-destructive methods, such as diffuse reflectance FT-IR. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the IR-fingerprint spectral region allowed classification of lignins according to origin and processing conditions. The antioxidative properties of each lignin sample in both aqueous and micellar systems were determined. All lignin samples showed radical scavenging activity, with sisal and abaca lignin being the most effective radical scavengers. The radical scavenging efficiency of the most efficient lignin was about 20% of that of BHT and tocopherol (based on weight), compounds that are commonly used in food and cosmetic industries. Multivariate analysis was applied to correlate chemical composition and antioxidative properties of lignins with the FT-IR spectral data. Partial least squares (PLS) models were able to predict the major components' concentrations and radical scavenging activity at the 99% confidence level presenting r2 values higher than 0.80 in most cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boeriu, C. G., Bravo, D., Gosselink, R. J. A., & van Dam, J. E. G.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Boeriu, Carmen G.
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
205-218
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021916337
Cited by
1,002
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
lignin, FTIR spectroscopy, lignin chemical composition, free radical scavenging, antioxidant activity, softwood lignin, hardwood lignin, partial least squares regression, principal component analysis, micellar systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review