Cited by 55Wood Treatment and PropertiesAgricultural and Food SciencesThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Chemical characterization and fuel properties of wood and bark of two oaks from Oaxaca, Mexico

Ruiz-Aquino, Faustino, González-Peña, Marcos M., Valdez-Hernández, Juan I., Revilla, Ursula S., Romero-Manzanares, Angélica·2015·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Herein, we describe the chemical composition of sapwood, heartwood and bark of Quercus laurina and Q. crassifolia, from Ixtlán de Juarez, Oaxaca, Mexico. We also report on the fuel characteristics of wood, bark and charcoal for these species. There was no significant difference in lignin (24.9–25.5%), α-cellulose (47.6–47.9%), and hemicellulose (22.4–23.2%) contents between Q. crassifolia and Q. laurina wood, while the ash content, hot water solubility, and total extractive content were higher in Q. crassifolia wood. The contribution of lignin, α-cellulose, hemicelluloses, suberin, and total extractives in barks, were 25.2–39.6%, 12.2–49.6%, 18.6–23.6%, 1.99–26.6%, and 12.7–31.7%, respectively. Bark had 4–8 times as much ash as the corresponding wood. The wood high heating value (HHV) of both oaks (19.3–19.4MJkg−1), was higher compared to other temperate hardwoods; the charcoal HHV varied from 32.0 to 33.3MJkg−1. Because of its high polysaccharide (69.7–70.8%) and low extractive (5.29–8.88%) and ash (0.30–0.95%) contents, wood of both species is deemed as suitable for the production of cellulosic pulp, while the content of suberin in the outer bark (20.1–26.6%), suggests its potential as biopolymers source. The fuel properties of wood and charcoal from both species indicate their aptitude as solid fuel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ruiz-Aquino, F., González-Peña, M. M., Valdez-Hernández, J. I., Revilla, U. S., & Romero-Manzanares, A.
Affiliations
  • Chapingo Autonomous University (MX)
  • Colegio de Postgraduados (MX)
Corresponding author
González-Peña, Marcos M.
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
65
Pages
90-95
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016117028
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
Quercus laurina, Quercus crassifolia, oak wood, bark, wood chemistry, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, suberin, extractives, ash content, higher heating value, charcoal, fuel properties, cellulosic pulp, biopolymers, solid fuels, Oaxaca

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review