Sesquiterpenes from stigma maydis (Zea mays) as a crop by-product and their potential neuroprotection and inhibitory activities of Aβ aggregation
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays Linn.) during industrial processing generates a vast amount of residues including stigma maydis, which is generally regarded as a waste and discarded. However, there are great medicine and economic value in the industrial crop wastes. With the aim of fully utilizing the stigma maydis as a valuable source of bioactive components, a phytochemical investigation on stigma maydis was performed, leading to the isolation of five new macrocarpene-type sesquiterpenes (1–5), named stigmenes A-E, along with a known analogue stigmene F (6). The chemical structures of all compounds were unambiguously determined by employing various spectroscopic measurements. Their absolute configurations were confirmed by comparison of the experimental and calculated ECD data. All compounds were screened for the inhibitory effect of amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation, among which 1 exhibited the most significant inhibitory activity. Molecular docking was used to predict the putative binding mode as the mechanism of action against Aβ aggregation. In addition, neuroprotection against H2O2-induced SH-SY5Y cell injury for all compounds was evaluated, and 5 and 6 were the most active. In total, the results suggest that stigma maydis is a promising and valuable crop waste for the pharmaceutical industry of neurological diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stigma maydis crop waste containing Stigmene A and Stigmene B is a promising source for pharmaceutical firms involved in manufacturing/research of formulations for neurological disorders such as AD.
“The result of the study suggested that the presence of these two valuable compounds made Stigma maydis crop waste a promising source for the pharmaceutical firms involved in the manufacturing/research of formulations for neurological disorders such as AD.”
From Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Potential of Various Sesquiterpene Analogues for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [138]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Qi, X.-L., Zhao, P., Zhang, Y.-Y., Bai, M., Lin, B., Huang, X.-X., & Song, S.-J.
- Affiliations
- Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Xiao-Xiao
- Song, Shao-Jiang
- Venue
- Industrial Crops and Products
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 411-417
- ISSN
- 0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804606364
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Project of Innovation Team (LT2015027)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Keywords
- sesquiterpenes, amyloid beta aggregation inhibition, neuroprotection, crop by-products, agricultural waste valorization, SH-SY5Y cells, hydrogen peroxide stress, molecular docking, absolute configuration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review