Cited by 66Plant tissue culture and regenerationGenetic diversity and population structureFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Genetic Stability Analysis Using DNA Barcoding and Molecular Markers and Foliar Micro-Morphological Analysis of In Vitro Regenerated and In Vivo Grown Plants of Artemisia Vulgaris L

Jogam, Phanikanth, Sandhya, Dulam, Shekhawat, Mahipal S., Alok, Anshu, M, Manokari, Abbagani, Sadanandam, Allini, Venkateswar Rao·2020·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

The current study provides an enhanced and reproducible micropropagation system in Artemisia vulgaris L. using nodal explants of mature plants. The explants were cultured on basal Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) medium augmented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and Kinetin (Kin) concentrations individually. Direct regeneration of shoots (7.7 ± 0.36 shoots per explant) from nodal meristems was attained on MS medium combined with 1.5 mg L⁻¹ BAP alone. Sub-culturing of these cultures on MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg L⁻¹ BAP and 0.5 mg L⁻¹ inddole-3 acetic acid (IAA) helped in further multiplication of shoots (75.8 ± 1.00 shoots per culture vessel). Elongated shoots were transferred to half strength MS medium contained 1.0 mg L⁻¹ IBA for roots formation. Rooting was also stimulated from the sliced ends of the shoots via ex vitro rooting method by pulse treating the shoots with 300 mg L⁻¹ IBA for 5 min. Well rooted plants were shifted into small paper cups having manure: sand: soil in 1: 1: 1 proportion for hardening. The acclimatized plants were shifted to the natural field conditions for complete plant growth. Start codon targeted (SCoT), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers and universal DNA barcoding (rbcLa gene primers) were applied to analyze the genetic stability of micropropagated plants with the mother plant. The banding patterns of regenerants were found to be monomorphic in nature, representing the similarity with the mother plant and no somaclonal variations were…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112476

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 66

Authors
Jogam, P., Sandhya, D., Shekhawat, M. S., Alok, A., M, M., Abbagani, S., & Allini, V. R.
Affiliations
  • Kakatiya University (IN)
  • Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for Post Graduate Studies (IN)
  • Panjab University (IN)
Corresponding author
Allini, Venkateswar Rao
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
151
Pages
112476
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021123332
Cited by
66
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University Grants Commission-Special Assistance Programme, Government of India (F-5-24/2015/DRS-II)
  • Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (IF160264)
  • Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (EMR/2016/007795)
  • Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Government of India (21(1067)/19/EMR-II)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
mugwort, micropropagation, nodal explants, somaclonal variation, genetic stability, SCoT markers, ISSR markers, shoot multiplication, ex vitro rooting, acclimatization, stomata, trichomes, leaf venation, in vitro regeneration, plant tissue culture, benzyladenine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review