Recent progress on the remediation of dyes in wastewater using cellulose-based adsorbents
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCA and NA are effective in elucidating complex relationships in environmental data.
“Principal component analysis (PCA) (Cai et al. 2022; Samuel et al. 2023) and network analysis (NA) (Dsikowitzky et al. 2017; Azli et al. 2022) are effective in elucidating complex relationships in environmental data.”
From A study of surface water quality using organic pollution indices: Comparative characteristics and educational opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Samuel et al. 2023
Cites
Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: a critical review
Dutta, S., Gupta, B., Srivastava, S. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ma00354b · Cited by 1,296 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-D., Lin, Y.-C., Ho, S.-H., Zhou, Y., & Ren, N.-Q. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.094 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biedunkova, O., Kuznietsov, P., & Korbutiak, V. (2025) · Water Quality Research Journal · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2025.044 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Samuel, M. S., John. J, A., Ravikumar, M., Raizada, P., Wan Azelee, N. I., Selvarajan, E., & Selvasembian, R.
- ORCID
- Selvarajan, Ethiraj
- Venue
- Industrial Crops and Products
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 206
- Pages
- 117590
- ISSN
- 0926-6690
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- SRM Institute of Science and Technology
- Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (R.J130000.7851.4L905)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
