The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency
Open accessAbstract
This study draws on literature at the intersection of servitization, digital business models and supply chain management. Work empirically explores how digital disruption has affected Business-to-Business (B2B) interdependencies. Dematerialization of physical products is transforming the way firms are positioned in the supply chain due to a reduction in production and transport costs and the different ways business engage with customers. Specifically, we propose that these new market conditions can empower downstream firms. We further propose that upstream firms can still capture additional value through digital service if their servitized offer includes difficult to imitate elements. The context of the analysis is the publishing industry. The Payment Card method employed is used to test UK and US consumer's perceptions of digital formats (eBooks) and assess their willingness to pay in relation to printed formats. The method undertaken enables us to elicit aggregated consumer demand for eBooks which in turn identifies optimal pricing strategies for the digital services. Analysis demonstrates that during digital servitization upstream firms should seek to deploy unique resources to ensure their strategic position in the supply chain is not diminished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 · Cited by 1,489
Cited by
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 · Cited by 5,720
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009 · Cited by 584
Procurement 4.0: Factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains
Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-06-2017-0139 · Cited by 429
A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems
Zheng, P., Lin, T.-J., Chen, C.-H., & Xu, X. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.101 · Cited by 414
Transformational shifts through digital servitization
Tronvoll, B., Sklyar, A., Sörhammar, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O. F., Parry, G., & Georgantzis, N.
- Venue
- Industrial Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 69-81
- ISSN
- 0019-8501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2469563715
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 84.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.