Cited by 106Infant Development and Preterm CareAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Attachment representations in mothers of preterm infants

Korja, Riikka, Savonlahti, Elina, Haataja, Leena, Lapinleimu, Helena, Manninen, Hanna, Piha, Jorma, Lehtonen, Liisa·2009·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess attachment representations in mothers of preterm infants using the Working Model of Child Interview (WMCI) at the 12 months of the infant's corrected age. In addition, the relation between WMCI representation categories and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score at 6 months of the infant's corrected age was studied. There were 38 mothers of preterm infants (<1500 g or <32 gestational weeks) and 45 mothers of full-term infants. The results showed no differences between the study groups in the distribution of the three main representation categories (balanced, disengaged and distorted). However, there were qualitative differences in representations between the groups. Furthermore, maternal depression symptoms were associated with distorted representation category. We suggest that despite the qualitative differences in the mothers' representations, mothers of preterm infants are as likely to form balanced attachments with their infants as mothers of full-term infants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mothers who were diagnosed as depressed were more likely to have an insecure state of mind regarding attachment and had more negative perceptions of their relationship with their infant than nondepressed mothers.

    “mothers who were diagnosed as depressed were more likely to have an insecure state of mind regarding attachment; they had more negative perceptions of their relationship with their infant than nondepressed mothers.54,64”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 106

Authors
Korja, R., Savonlahti, E., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H., Manninen, H., Piha, J., & Lehtonen, L.
Affiliations
Turku University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Korja, Riikka
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
305-311
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053236687
Cited by
106
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
preterm infants, mothers of preterm infants, maternal depression, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, infant attachment, term infants
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review