Cited by 69Sleep and Work-Related FatigueContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

A sensor fusion approach for drowsiness detection in wearable ultra-low-power systems

Open access
Kartsch, Victor Javier, Benatti, Simone, Schiavone, Pasquale Davide, Rossi, Davide, Benini, Luca·2018·Information Fusion

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a pilot study (n = 10), a single-channel electroencephalogram and IMU sensor detected five different levels of drowsiness with an average of 95.2% accuracy.

    “To explore the use of wearable devices to detect drowsiness, one recent pilot study (n = 10) used a single-channel electroencephalogram and IMU sensor to detect five different levels of drowsiness with an average of 95.2% accuracy [91].”

    From Wearables and the Medical Revolution (2018) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Q. Ji, Z. Zhu, P. Lan, Real-time nonintrusive monitoring and prediction of driver fatigue, IEEE transactions on vehicular tech- nology 53 (4) (2004) 1052-1068.
  2. A. Rahman, et al., Real time drowsiness detection using eye blink monitoring, in: NSEC, IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-7.
  3. J. Xu, R. F. Yazicioglu, B. Grundlehner, P. Harpe, K. A. A. Mak- inwa, C. V. Hoof, A 160uw 8-channel active electrode system for eeg monitoring, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 5 (6) (2011) 555-567.

Authors
Kartsch, V. J., Benatti, S., Schiavone, P. D., Rossi, D., & Benini, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kartsch, Victor Javier
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
43
Pages
66-76
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770426008
Cited by
69
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Fusion (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (162524)
  • ERC (ERC-AdG-291125)
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (732631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
drowsiness detection, sensor fusion, wearable devices, ultra-low-power systems, EEG, inertial measurement unit, motion sensing, ARM Cortex-M4, energy optimization, battery life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review