The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy
Abstract
Abstract Multi-sensor data fusion technology plays an important role in real applications. Because of the flexibility and effectiveness in modeling and processing the uncertain information regardless of prior probabilities, Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is widely applied in a variety of fields of information fusion. However, counter-intuitive results may come out when fusing the highly conflicting evidences. In order to deal with this problem, a novel method for multi-sensor data fusion based on a new belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy was proposed. First, a new Belief Jensen–Shannon divergence is devised to measure the discrepancy and conflict degree between the evidences; then, the credibility degree can be obtained to represent the reliability of the evidences. Next, considering the uncertainties of the evidences, the information volume of the evidences are measured by making use of the belief entropy to indicate the relative importance of the evidences. Afterwards, the credibility degree of each evidence is modified by taking advantage of the quantitative information volume which will be utilized to obtain an appropriate weight in terms of each evidence. Ultimately, the final weights of the evidences are applied to adjust the bodies of the evidences before using the Dempster’s combination rule. A numerical example is illustrated that the proposed method is feasible and effective in handling the conflicting evidences, where the belief value of target increases to 99.05%. Furthermore, an application in fault diagnosis is given to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method outperforms other related methods where the basic belief assignment (BBA) of the true target is 89.73%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: State-of-the-art and research challenges
Gravina, R., Alinia, P., Ghasemzadeh, H., & Fortino, G. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.09.005 · Cited by 899
Cited by
An Overview of IoT Sensor Data Processing, Fusion, and Analysis Techniques
Krishnamurthi, R., Kumar, A., Gopinathan, D., Nayyar, A., & Qureshi, B. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20216076 · Cited by 406
Divergence measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application in medical diagnosis
Xiao, F., & Ding, W. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.043 · Cited by 292
Self-citationA survey: Optimization and applications of evidence fusion algorithm based on Dempster–Shafer theory
Zhao, K., Li, L., Chen, Z., Sun, R., Yuan, G., & Li, J. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109075 · Cited by 150
Zhang, Z., Yang, S., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88913-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, F.
- Venue
- Information Fusion
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 23-32
- ISSN
- 1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889405224
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.04.003
- The paper
- Xiao, F. (2019). Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy. Information Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.