Cited by 37Gaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

ANFIS fusion algorithm for eye movement recognition via soft multi-functional electronic skin

Dong, Wentao, Yang, Lin, Gravina, Raffaele, Fortino, Giancarlo·2021·Information Fusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 37

Authors
Dong, W., Yang, L., Gravina, R., & Fortino, G.
Affiliations
  • East China Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • University of Calabria (IT)
Corresponding author
Yang, Lin
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
71
Pages
99-108
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133230866
Cited by
37
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
eye movement recognition, electrooculogram, skin temperature, serpentine structures, stretchable sensors, data fusion, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, eye movement classification, principal component analysis, wearable electronics, eye tracking, driving safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review