Scaling of HIS in a global context: Same, same, but different
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only three eHealth projects were scaled up to national level.
“In terms of projects geographical distribution, 24 were executed in Nairobi whilst 15 were designed to have a national coverage but only 3 were scaled up.”
From Assessing the feasibility of eHealth and mHealth: a systematic review and analysis of initiatives implemented in Kenya (2017) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Sahay, S., Sæbø, J., & Braa, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Sahay, Sundeep
- Venue
- Information and Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 294-323
- ISSN
- 1471-7727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087790345
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information and Organization (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- health information systems, technology transfer, Bruno Latour, sociotechnical arrangements, open source software, web platform, mobile network infrastructure, developing countries, global-local relations, institutional practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
