Cited by 44Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Systematic literature review on the impacts of agile release engineering practices

Karvonen, Teemu, Behutiye, Woubshet, Oivo, Markku, Kuvaja, Pasi·2017·Information and Software Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karvonen, T., Behutiye, W., Oivo, M., & Kuvaja, P.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Karvonen, Teemu
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
86
Pages
87-100
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580363593
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous deployment, rapid release, change management, software quality assurance, stakeholder acceptance, reporting quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review