Systematic literature review on the impacts of agile release engineering practices
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inclusion of marginalized voices such as persons with disabilities, elderly users, and those with low digital literacy is particularly enhanced through participatory methods.
“The inclusion of marginalized voices such as persons with disabilities, elderly users, and those with low digital literacy is particularly enhanced through participatory methods (Agostinho et al., 2016; Karvonen et al., 2017).”
From A Systematic Literature Review of User-Centric Design in Digital Business Systems Enhancing Accessibility, Adoption, and Organizational Impact (2023) · cites this paper as Karvonen et al., 2017
Without active user participation, digital systems risk becoming technocentric artifacts designed by engineers and managers who are distanced from the operational realities of end-users.
“Scholars argue that without active user participation, digital systems risk becoming 'technocentric artifacts' tools designed by engineers and managers who are distanced from the operational realities of end-users (Karvonen et al., 2017).”
From A Systematic Literature Review of User-Centric Design in Digital Business Systems Enhancing Accessibility, Adoption, and Organizational Impact (2023) · cites this paper as Karvonen et al., 2017
User-centered interfaces act as critical mediators between enterprise system functionality and organizational performance.
“Hence, user-centered interfaces act as critical mediators between enterprise system functionality and organizational performance (Karvonen et al., 2017).”
From A Systematic Literature Review of User-Centric Design in Digital Business Systems Enhancing Accessibility, Adoption, and Organizational Impact (2023) · cites this paper as Karvonen et al., 2017
Cites
DevOps: A Definition and Perceived Adoption Impediments
Smeds, J., Nybom, K., & Porres, I. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_14 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DevSecOps: A Multivocal Literature Review
Myrbakken, H., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2017) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_2 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Master of Science in Management Information Systems, L. U., Barua, T., Rahman, M. A., & MBA in Management Information System, I. A. U. (2023) · American Journal of Scholarly Research and Innovation · doi:10.63125/36w7fn47 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karvonen, T., Behutiye, W., Oivo, M., & Kuvaja, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Karvonen, Teemu
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580363593
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous deployment, rapid release, change management, software quality assurance, stakeholder acceptance, reporting quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review