Cited by 63Healthcare Systems and ReformsPublic Health and Social InequalitiesPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

No cash, no care: how user fees endanger health—lessons learnt regarding financial barriers to healthcare services in Burundi, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Haiti and Mali

Ponsar, Frederique, Tayler-Smith, Katie, Philips, Mit, Gerard, Seco, Van Herp, Michel, Reid, Tony, Zachariah, Rony·2011·International Health

Abstract

Although user fees are a common form of healthcare financing in resource-poor countries, there is growing consensus that their use compromises health service utilisation and population health. Between 2003 and 2006, Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) conducted population-based surveys in Burundi, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Haiti and Mali to determine the impact of user fees on healthcare-seeking behaviour and access. For general and disease-specific conditions, MSF also measured the impact of (i) reduced payment systems in Chad, Mali, Haiti and Burundi and (ii) user fee abolition for certain population groups in Burundi and Mali. User fees were found to result in low utilisation of public health facilities, exclusion from health care and exacerbation of impoverishment, forcing many to seek alternative care. Financial barriers affected 30-60% of people requiring health care. Exemption systems targeting vulnerable individuals proved ineffective, benefiting only 1-3.5% of populations. Alternative payment systems, requiring 'modest' fees from users (e.g. low flat fees), did not adequately improve coverage of essential health needs, especially for the poorest and most vulnerable. Conversely, user fee abolition for large population groups led to rapid increases in utilisation of health services and coverage of essential healthcare needs. Abolition of user fees appears crucial in helping to reduce existing barriers to health care. The challenge for health authorities and donor agencies is around working creatively to remove the fees while addressing the financial consequences of improved access and providing quality care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 63

Authors
Ponsar, F., Tayler-Smith, K., Philips, M., Gerard, S., Van Herp, M., Reid, T., & Zachariah, R.
Affiliations
Médecins Sans Frontières (UG)
Venue
International Health
Published
2011-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
91-100
ISSN
  • 1876-3405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-3413
OpenAlex
W2120006888
Cited by
63
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Medecins Sans Frontieres Field Research (Medecins Sans Frontieres) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
user fees, financial barriers to care, health care utilization, health care access, health care financing, impoverishment, health-seeking behavior, vulnerable populations, alternative payment models, Médecins Sans Frontières, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Chad, Haiti, Mali

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review