Alcohol-related injury visits: Do we know the true prevalence in U.S. trauma centres?
Abstract
Introduction Alcohol consumption is a significant risk factor for injuries. Further, level I trauma centres are mandated to screen and provide a brief intervention for identified problem drinkers. However, a valid population-based estimate of the magnitude of the problem is unknown. Therefore, the goal of this study is to evaluate the extent to which the present literature provides a valid estimate of the prevalence of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres. Methods A Medline search for all articles from 1966 to 2007 that might provide prevalence estimates of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres yielded 836 articles in English language journals. This review included only papers whose main or secondary goal was to estimate the prevalence of positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) or acute intoxication. Both a crude aggregate estimate and sample size adjusted estimate were calculated from the included papers and the coverage and comparability of methods were evaluated. Results Of the 15 studies that met inclusion criteria, incidence estimates of alcohol-related visits ranged from 26.2% to 62.5% and yielded an aggregate, weighted estimate of 32.5%. Target population, capture rate, and threshold for a positive screening result varied considerably across studies. No study provided a comprehensive estimate, i.e., of all trauma patients hospitalised, treated and released, or who died. Conclusions Although the incidence of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres appears very high perhaps higher than any other medical setting, the validity of our aggregate estimate is threatened by crucial methodological considerations. The lack of a methodologically valid prevalence estimate hinders efforts to devise appropriate policies for trauma centres and across medical settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For underage drinking, the AAFs for nonfatal injuries are probably higher than those used in the current study.
“For underage drinking, AAFs for nonfatal injuries are probably higher than those the current study used.32”
From Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006 (2011) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07495-8 · Cited by 4,492 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006
Bouchery, E. E., Harwood, H. J., Sacks, J. J., Simon, C. J., & Brewer, R. D. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.045 · Cited by 1,041 · see citing works
Pourmand, A., AlRemeithi, R., Kartiko, S., Bronstein, D., & Tran, Q. K. (2023) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.002 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacLeod, J. B. A., & Hungerford, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacLeod, Jana B.A.
- Hungerford, Daniel W.
- ORCID
- MacLeod, Jana B.A.
- Venue
- Injury
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 922-926
- ISSN
- 0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970207456
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Injury (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
- Keywords
- alcohol-related injuries, trauma centers, prevalence estimation, blood alcohol concentration, acute poisoning, alcohol screening, brief intervention, problem drinking, methodological validity, trauma patients
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholic Intoxication, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Policy Making, Research Design, Risk Factors, Trauma Centers, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence, MEDLINE, Age Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review