Cited by 76Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Alcohol-related injury visits: Do we know the true prevalence in U.S. trauma centres?

MacLeod, Jana B.A., Hungerford, Daniel W.·2011·Injury

Abstract

Introduction Alcohol consumption is a significant risk factor for injuries. Further, level I trauma centres are mandated to screen and provide a brief intervention for identified problem drinkers. However, a valid population-based estimate of the magnitude of the problem is unknown. Therefore, the goal of this study is to evaluate the extent to which the present literature provides a valid estimate of the prevalence of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres. Methods A Medline search for all articles from 1966 to 2007 that might provide prevalence estimates of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres yielded 836 articles in English language journals. This review included only papers whose main or secondary goal was to estimate the prevalence of positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) or acute intoxication. Both a crude aggregate estimate and sample size adjusted estimate were calculated from the included papers and the coverage and comparability of methods were evaluated. Results Of the 15 studies that met inclusion criteria, incidence estimates of alcohol-related visits ranged from 26.2% to 62.5% and yielded an aggregate, weighted estimate of 32.5%. Target population, capture rate, and threshold for a positive screening result varied considerably across studies. No study provided a comprehensive estimate, i.e., of all trauma patients hospitalised, treated and released, or who died. Conclusions Although the incidence of alcohol-related visits to U.S. trauma centres appears very high perhaps higher than any other medical setting, the validity of our aggregate estimate is threatened by crucial methodological considerations. The lack of a methodologically valid prevalence estimate hinders efforts to devise appropriate policies for trauma centres and across medical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.098

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For underage drinking, the AAFs for nonfatal injuries are probably higher than those used in the current study.

    “For underage drinking, AAFs for nonfatal injuries are probably higher than those the current study used.32”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacLeod, J. B. A., & Hungerford, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • MacLeod, Jana B.A.
  • Hungerford, Daniel W.
Venue
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
922-926
ISSN
0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970207456
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
alcohol-related injuries, trauma centers, prevalence estimation, blood alcohol concentration, acute poisoning, alcohol screening, brief intervention, problem drinking, methodological validity, trauma patients
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholic Intoxication, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Policy Making, Research Design, Risk Factors, Trauma Centers, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence, MEDLINE, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review