Cited by 29Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraffic and Road SafetyTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Psychological distress following a motor vehicle crash: A systematic review of preventative interventions

Abstract

Introduction Psychological distress following a motor vehicle crash (MVC) is prevalent, especially when the person sustains an associated physical injury. Psychological distress can exhibit as elevated anxiety and depressive mood, as well as presenting as mental disorders such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). If unmanaged, psychological distress can contribute to, or exacerbate negative outcomes such as social disengagement (e.g., loss of employment) and poor health-related quality of life, as well as contribute to higher costs to insurers. This systematic review summarises current research concerning early psychological intervention strategies aimed at preventing elevated psychological distress occurring following a MVC.Method A systematic review of psychological preventative intervention studies was performed. Searches of Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were used to locate relevant studies published between 1985 and September 2015. Included studies were those investigating MVC survivors who had received an early psychological intervention aimed at preventing psychological distress, and which had employed pre- and post- measures of constructs such as depression, anxiety and disorders such as PTSD.Results Searches resulted in 2608 records. Only six studies investigated a psychological preventative intervention post-MVC. Interventions such as injury health education, physical activity and health promotion, and therapist-assisted problem solving did not result in significant treatment effects. Another six studies investigated psychological interventions given to MVC survivors who were assessed as sub-clinically psychologically distressed prior to their randomisation. Efficacy was varied, however three studies employing cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) found significant reductions in psychological distress compared to wait-list controls.Conclusion Psychological interventions aimed at preventing psychological distress post-MVC are limited, often involving small samples, with subsequent poor statistical power and subsequent high risk of bias. These factors make it difficult to draw conclusions, however CBT appears encouraging and therefore worthy of consideration as a preventative intervention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chan, 2003, Posttraumatic stress disorder and its impact on the economic and health costs of motor vehicle accidents in South Australia, J Clin Psychiatr, 64, 175, 10.4088/JCP.v64n0210 · DOI
  2. Mayou, 2002, Posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents: 3-year follow-up of a prospective longitudinal study, Behav Res Ther, 40, 665, 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00069-9 · DOI
  3. Mayou, 2000, Psychological debriefing for road traffic accident victims: three-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial, Br J Psychiatry, 176, 589, 10.1192/bjp.176.6.589 · DOI
  4. Hobbs, 1996, A randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of road traffic accidents, BMJ: Br Med J, 313, 1438, 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1438 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Guest, R., Tran, Y., Gopinath, B., Cameron, I. D., & Craig, A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Guest, Rebecca
Venue
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
2415-2423
ISSN
0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517672503
Cited by
29
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traffic accidents, psychological distress, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety, early psychological intervention, preventive interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, trauma survivors, physical activity, health promotion
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Life Change Events, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review