The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 24,305
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,186
Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions
Stone, M. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · Cited by 10,881
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Another look at measures of forecast accuracy
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 · Cited by 5,757
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selectionPreprint
Arlot, S., & Célisse, A. (2010) · Cited by 3,625
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection
Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/09-ss054 · Cited by 3,522
Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order
SAID, S. E., & DICKEY, D. A. (1984) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/71.3.599 · Cited by 3,418
Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control.
Kendall, M. G., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1971) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344246 · Cited by 2,771
Cited by
Cross‐validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure
Roberts, D. R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M. S., Elith, J., Guillera‐Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., et al. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02881 · Cited by 3,689
A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction
Bergmeir, C., Hyndman, R. J., & Koo, B. (2018) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2017.11.003 · Cited by 743
Self-citationGradient boosting machine for modeling the energy consumption of commercial buildings
Touzani, S., Granderson, J., & Fernandes, S. (2018) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.039 · Cited by 503
Evaluating time series forecasting models: an empirical study on performance estimation methods
Cerqueira, V., Torgo, L., & Mozetič, I. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-020-05910-7 · Cited by 485
Review and prospect of data-driven techniques for load forecasting in integrated energy systems
Zhu, J., Dong, H., Zheng, W., Li, S., Huang, Y., & Xi, L. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119269 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergmeir, C., & Benítez, J. M.
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 192-213
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981780459
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028
- The paper
- Bergmeir, C., & Benítez, J. M. (2012). On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.