The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shared-nearest-neighbor-based clustering by fast search and find of density peaks
Abstract
Abstract Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks (DPC) is a new clustering method that was reported in Science in June 2014. This clustering algorithm is based on the assumption that cluster centers have high local densities and are generally far from each other. With a decision graph, cluster centers can be easily located. However, this approach suffers from certain disadvantages. First, the definition of the local density and distance measurement is too simple; therefore, the DPC algorithm might perform poorly on complex datasets that are of multiple scales, cross-winding, of various densities, or of high dimensionality. Second, the one-step allocation strategy is not robust and has poor fault tolerance. Thus, if a point is assigned incorrectly, then the subsequent allocation will further amplify the error, resulting in more errors, which will have a severe negative impact on the clustering results. Third, the cutoff distance d c is generally difficult to determine since the range of each attribute is unknown in most cases. Even when being normalized or using the relative percentage method, a small change in d c will still cause a conspicuous fluctuation in the result, and this is especially true for real-world datasets. Considering these drawbacks, we propose a shared-nearest-neighbor-based clustering by fast search and find of density peaks (SNN-DPC) algorithm. We present three new definitions: SNN similarity, local density ρ and distance from the nearest larger density point δ . These definitions take the information of the nearest neighbors and the shared neighbors into account, and they can self-adapt to the local surroundings. Then, we introduce our two-step allocation method: inevitably subordinate and possibly subordinate. The former quickly and accurately recognizes and allocates the points that certainly belong to one cluster by counting the number of shared neighbors between two points. The latter assigns the remaining points by finding the clusters to which more neighbors belong. The algorithm is benchmarked on publicly available synthetic datasets, UCI real-world datasets and the Olivetti Faces dataset, which are often used to test the performance of clustering algorithms. We compared the results with those of DPC, fuzzy weighted K-nearest neighbors density peak clustering (FKNN-DPC), affinity propagation (AP), ordering points to identify the clustering structure (OPTICS), density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), and K-means. The metrics used are adjusted mutual information (AMI), adjusted Rand index (ARI), and Fowlkes–Mallows index (FMI). The experimental results prove that our method can recognize clusters regardless of their size, shape, and dimensions; is robust to noise; and is remarkably superior to DPC, FKNN-DPC, AP, OPTICS, DBSCAN, and K-means.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,156
(1967) · Cited by 23,719
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,522
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 20,825
(1996) · Cited by 20,179
A tutorial on spectral clustering
von Luxburg, U. (2007) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z · Cited by 10,349
(2008) · Data Mining and Market Intelligence for Optimal Marketing Returns · doi:10.4324/9780080878096-12 · Cited by 6,954
Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points
Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136800 · Cited by 6,758
Cited by
Fast hierarchical clustering of local density peaks via an association degree transfer method
Guan, J., Li, S., He, X., Zhu, J., & Chen, J. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.071 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, R., Wang, H., & Yu, X.
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 450
- Pages
- 200-226
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789456849
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shared-nearest-neighbor-based clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.031
- The paper
- Liu, R., Wang, H., & Yu, X. (2018). Shared-nearest-neighbor-based clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.