Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance

Elreedy, Dina, Atiya, Amir F.·2019·Information Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Imbalanced classification problems are often encountered in many applications. The challenge is that there is a minority class that has typically very little data and is often the focus of attention. One approach for handling imbalance is to generate extra data from the minority class, to overcome its shortage of data. The Synthetic Minority over-sampling TEchnique (SMOTE) is one of the dominant methods in the literature that achieves this extra sample generation. It is based on generating examples on the lines connecting a point and one its K -nearest neighbors. This paper presents a theoretical and experimental analysis of the SMOTE method. We explore the accuracy of how faithful it emulates the underlying density. To our knowledge, this is the first mathematical analysis of the SMOTE method. Moreover, we analyze the effect of the different factors on generation accuracy, such as the dimension, size of the training set and the considered number of neighbors K . We also provide a qualitative analysis that examines the factors affecting its accuracy. In addition, we explore the impact of SMOTE on classification boundary, and classification performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
Elreedy, D., & Atiya, A. F.
Venue
Information Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
505
Pages
32-64
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963613787
Cited by
756
References
48
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070
The paper
Elreedy, D., & Atiya, A. F. (2019). A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.