The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep feature learning for histopathological image classification of canine mammary tumors and human breast cancer
Abstract
Abstract Canine mammary tumors (CMTs) have high incidences and mortality rates in dogs. They are also considered excellent models for human breast cancer studies. Diagnoses of both, human breast cancer and CMTs, are done by histopathological analysis of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections by skilled pathologists: a process that is very tedious and time-consuming. The existence of heterogeneous and diverse types of CMTs and the paucity of skilled veterinary pathologists justify the need for automated diagnosis. Deep learning-based approaches have recently gained popularity for analyzing histopathological images of human breast cancer. However, so far, due to the lack of any publicly available CMT database, no studies have focused on the automated classification of CMTs. To the best of our knowledge, we have introduced for the first time a dataset of CMT histopathological images (CMTHis). Further, we have proposed a framework based on VGGNet-16, and evaluated the performance of the fused framework along with different classifiers on the CMT dataset (CMTHis) and human breast cancer dataset (BreakHis). We also explored the effect of data augmentation, stain normalization, and magnification on the performance of the proposed framework. The proposed framework, with support vector machines, resulted in mean accuracies of 97% and 93% for binary classification of human breast cancer and CMT respectively, which validates the efficacy of the proposed system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061
Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.222 · Cited by 3,150
A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis
Macenko, M., Niethammer, M., Marron, J. S., Borland, D., Woosley, J. T., Guan, X., Schmitt, C., & Thomas, N. E. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2009.5193250 · Cited by 1,482
Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Litjens, G., Gerke, P., Jacobs, C., van Riel, S. J., Wille, M. M. W., Naqibullah, M., Sanchez, C. I., & van Ginneken, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2536809 · Cited by 1,258
Chest pathology detection using deep learning with non-medical training
Bar, Y., Diamant, I., Wolf, L., Lieberman, S., Konen, E., & Greenspan, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2015.7163871 · Cited by 392
Cited by
Saba, T. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033 · Cited by 284
Huo, T., Li, L., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Yang, Q., Wu, W., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26771-1 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, A., Singh, S. K., Saxena, S., Lakshmanan, K., Sangaiah, A. K., Chauhan, H., Shrivastava, S., & Singh, R. K.
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 508
- Pages
- 405-421
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970152602
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep feature learning for histopathological image classification of canine mammary tumors and human breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.072
- The paper
- Kumar, A., Singh, S. K., Saxena, S., Lakshmanan, K., Sangaiah, A. K., Chauhan, H., Shrivastava, S., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Deep feature learning for histopathological image classification of canine mammary tumors and human breast cancer. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
