The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
An intelligent scheme for big data recovery in Internet of Things based on Multi-Attribute assistance and Extremely randomized trees
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schelter et al. [57] proposed Hedgecut, a classification model based on extremely randomized trees (ERTs).
“To improve the efficiency of the unlearning process for tree-based machine learning models, Schelter et al. [57] proposed Hedgecut , a classification model based on extremely randomized trees (ERTs) [100].”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Akyildiz, 2002, Wireless sensor networks: a survey, Comput. Netw., 38, 393, 10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 · DOI
- Fan, 2016, Game balanced multi-factor multicast routing in sensor grid networks, Inf. Sci., 367, 550, 10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.049 · DOI
- Zhou, 2016, Clustering hierarchy protocol in wireless sensor networks using an improved PSO algorithm, IEEE Access, 5, 2241, 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2633826 · DOI
- Wu, 2016, Data prediction, compression, and recovery in clustered wireless sensor networks for environmental monitoring applications, Inf. Sci., 329, 800, 10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.004 · DOI
- Rong, 2019, Energy-aware clustering and routing in infrastructure failure areas with D2D communication, IEEE Internet Things J., 6, 8645, 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2922202 · DOI
- Mao, 2019, Spatio-temporal deep learning method for ADHD fMRI classification, Inf. Sci., 499, 1, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.043 · DOI
- Bellavista, 2019, A social-driven edge computing architecture for mobile crowd sensing management, IEEE Commun. Mag., 57, 68, 10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800637 · DOI
- Cheng, 2019, Data recovery in wireless sensor networks based on attribute correlation and extremely randomized trees, J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput., 23, 1
- Zou, 2016, Energy-efficient data recovery via greedy algorithm for wireless sensor networks, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 2016, 1
- He, 2015, Data recovery in wireless sensor networks with joint matrix completion and sparsity constraints, IEEE Commun. Lett., 19, 2230, 10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2489212 · DOI
- Chen, 2017, GPU-accelerated parallel hierarchical extreme learning machine on flink for big data, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber.: Systems, 47, 2740, 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2690673 · DOI
- Huang, 2019, A queuing delay utilization scheme for on-path service aggregation in services oriented computing networks, IEEE Access, 7, 23816, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899402 · DOI
- X. Xie, X. Liu, H. Qi, B. Xiao, K. Li, J. Wu, Geographical Correlation-based Data Collection for Sensor-augmented RFID Systems, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2019, 1-1.
- Lawrence, 2005, The relationship between relative humidity and the dew-point temperature in moist air: a simple conversion and applications, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 225, 10.1175/BAMS-86-2-225 · DOI
- J. Koza, F. Bennett, D. Andre, M. Keane, Automated Design of Both the Topology and Sizing of Analog Electrical Circuits Using Genetic Programming, Artificial Intelligence in Design '96, 1996, 151–170. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou, 2016, Top k favorite probabilistic products queries, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 28, 2808, 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2584606 · DOI
- Donoho, 2006, Compressed sensing, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 52, 1289, 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 · DOI · Paper page
- Liao, 2019, Low-cost image compressive sensing with multiple measurement rates for object detection, Sensors, 19, 2079, 10.3390/s19092079 · DOI
- Quer, 2012, Sensing, compression, and recovery for WSNs: sparse signal modeling and monitoring framework, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 10, 3447, 10.1109/TWC.2012.081612.110612 · DOI
- G. Quer, R. Masiero, D. Munaretto, M. Rossi, J. Widmer, M. Zorzi, On the Interplay Between Routing and Signal Representation for Compressive Sensing in Wireless Sensor Networks, In: Proceedings of the Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA '09), IEEE, 2009, pp. 206–215. · DOI
- Chen, 2018, Spatial-temporal traffic speed patterns discovery and incomplete data recovery via SVD-combined tensor decomposition, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol., 86, 59, 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.023 · DOI
- Singh, 2014, Cluster head selection by randomness with data recovery in WSN, CSI Trans. ICT, 2, 97, 10.1007/s40012-014-0049-1 · DOI
- Cao, 2013, Data aggregation and recovery in wireless sensor networks using compressed sensing, Int. J. Sensor Networks, 22, 209, 10.1504/IJSNET.2016.080370 · DOI
- J. Chen, K.i Li, K. Bilal, K. Li, P. Yu, A Bi-layered Parallel Training Architecture for Large-scale Convolutional Neural Networks in Distributed Computing Environments, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2019, 30(5):965-976. · DOI
- Z. Tang, Y. Bao, H. Li, Group Sparsity-aware Convolutional Neural Network for Continuous Missing Data Recovery of Structural Health Monitoring, Structural Health Monitoring, 2020, 1-1. · DOI
- G. Chen, X. Liu, L. Kong, J. Lu, W. Shu, M. Wu, JSSDR: Joint-Sparse Sensory Data Recovery in Wireless Sensor Networks, In: 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), IEEE, 2013, pp. 367-374. · DOI
- Cover, 1967, Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 13, 21, 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 · DOI · Paper page
- Magán-Carrión, 2015, Multivariate statistical approach for anomaly detection and lost data recovery in wireless sensor networks, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 2015, 1
- L. Kong, D. Jiang, M. Wu, Optimizing the Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Cyber-Physical Systems for Environment Abstraction, In: 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, IEEE, 2010, pp. 179-188. · DOI
- Cheng, 2016, Energy-efficient node scheduling algorithms for wireless sensor networks, Inf. Sci., 329, 461, 10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.039 · DOI
- Chen, 2018, GFlink: an in-memory computing architecture on heterogeneous CPU-GPU clusters for big data, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 29, 1275, 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2794343 · DOI
- H. Cheng, L. Wu, Y. Zhang, N. Xiong, Data Recovery in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Markov Random Field Model, In: 2018 Tenth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), IEEE, 2018, pp. 706-711. · DOI
- Du, 2019, A deep learning method for data recovery in sensor networks using effective spatio-temporal correlation data, Sensor Review, 39, 208, 10.1108/SR-02-2018-0039 · DOI
- Xiao, 2017, Reporting l most influential objects in uncertain databases based on probabilistic reverse Top-k queries, Inf. Sci., 405, 207, 10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.028 · DOI
- Li, 2015, Hadoop recognition of biomedical named entity using conditional random fields, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 26, 3040, 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2368568 · DOI
- Geurts, 2006, Extremely Randomized Trees, Machine Learning, 63, 3, 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Keković, 2019, Detection of change points in time series with moving average filters and wavelet transform application to EEG signals, Neurophysiology, 51, 2, 10.1007/s11062-019-09783-y · DOI
- Bulac, 2016, Decision Trees, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 819
- A. Gupta, K. Gusain, B. Popli, Verifying the value and veracity of Extreme gradient boosted decision trees on a variety of datasets, In: 2016 11th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems(ICIIS), IEEE, 2016, pp. 457-462. · DOI
- Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- Du, 2019, Dynamic multi-client searchable symmetric encryption with support for boolean queries, Inf. Sci., 506, 234, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.014 · DOI
- Chen, 2019, A periodicity-based parallel time series prediction algorithm in cloud computing environments, Inf. Sci., 496, 506, 10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.045 · DOI
- J. Chen, K. Li, Q. Deng, K. Li, S. Philip, Distributed Deep Learning Model for Intelligent Video Surveillance Systems with Edge Computing, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 1-1. · DOI
- Zhou, 2016, Adaptive processing for distributed skyline queries over uncertain data, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 28, 371, 10.1109/TKDE.2015.2475764 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, H., Shi, Y., Wu, L., Guo, Y., & Xiong, N.
- Affiliations
- Fuzhou University (CN)
- Northeastern State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Hongju
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 557
- Pages
- 66-83
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120613103
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Keywords
- missing data recovery, Internet of Things, extra trees, outlier detection, data denoising, Spearman correlation, sensor data, data loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review