Cited by 47Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Relations among general intelligence (g), aptitude tests, and GPA: Linear effects dominate

Coyle, Thomas R.·2015·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 47

Authors
Coyle, T. R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Coyle, Thomas R.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
53
Pages
16-22
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1131672692
Cited by
47
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Funders
UTSA Faculty Development Leave
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
general intelligence, aptitude tests, college GPA, SAT, ACT, PSAT, Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, quadratic effects, test score prediction, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review