Relations among general intelligence (g), aptitude tests, and GPA: Linear effects dominate
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Little is known about which modifiable behavioral factors improve GPA in first-year college students.
“Currently, little is known about which modifiable behavioral factors improve GPA in first-year college students (5–7).”
From Nightly sleep duration predicts grade point average in the first year of college (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Coyle, T. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Corresponding author
- Coyle, Thomas R.
- ORCID
- Coyle, Thomas R.
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 16-22
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1131672692
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UTSA Faculty Development Leave
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- general intelligence, aptitude tests, college GPA, SAT, ACT, PSAT, Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, quadratic effects, test score prediction, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review