Cited by 16Cognitive Abilities and TestingDigital literacy in educationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Ecological momentary assessment of digital literacy: Influence of fluid and crystallized intelligence, domain-specific knowledge, and computer usage

Moehring, Anne, Schroeders, Ulrich, Leichtmann, Benedikt, Wilhelm, Oliver·2016·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moehring, A., Schroeders, U., Leichtmann, B., & Wilhelm, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Bamberg (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
59
Pages
170-180
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2541729175
Cited by
16
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-01-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
digital literacy, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, domain knowledge, computer use, web information retrieval, health knowledge, individual differences, ecological momentary assessment, vocational high school students, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review